From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A792C3858D32 for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2023 12:44:22 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org A792C3858D32 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1693917862; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=juzka1BxuSCulEwKLC6ty3v5+ImMAwnv2hdBvXycblM=; b=DYuSAGNnuH/3Ck5GkGzRrv/VKjymM87Cqgw6lV5Pb59ZEVCO2dUfjngWRxThtdIwyBm9M3 XRUmJ5cu4NT2FBokQDsERN4qa1e6sR9w81TrWdqjMoA7+WXdeXfPmQz30d1y+GmFj5KsMe 5S/LeC0urqfFL0htMamp2BOOX7pd18Q= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-302-ETfJoLIdM4azSlDl2UIklw-1; Tue, 05 Sep 2023 08:44:20 -0400 X-MC-Unique: ETfJoLIdM4azSlDl2UIklw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD8AA944EA9; Tue, 5 Sep 2023 12:44:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from oldenburg.str.redhat.com (unknown [10.2.16.42]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D5521121314; Tue, 5 Sep 2023 12:44:19 +0000 (UTC) From: Florian Weimer To: Andreas Schwab Cc: Andreas Schwab via Libc-alpha Subject: Re: [PATCH] Update getaddrinfo to RFC 6724 (bug 29496) References: <87v8cqsznx.fsf@oldenburg3.str.redhat.com> <87jzt47qyu.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2023 14:44:18 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Andreas Schwab's message of "Tue, 05 Sep 2023 14:31:49 +0200") Message-ID: <87fs3s7pst.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.3 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: * Andreas Schwab: > On Sep 05 2023, Florian Weimer wrote: > >> There's an erratum for this > > What does that mean? There's an unverified entry on this page: It discusses section 2.2. I do not agree with the proposed resolution. It essentially recommends going back to the old behavior which assumes strictly hierarchical IPv6 address assignment. Thanks, Florian