From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F9973858D3C for ; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 17:15:37 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 3F9973858D3C Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-72-CswIHcARPGyvFc4kNrLnOw-1; Mon, 08 Nov 2021 12:15:31 -0500 X-MC-Unique: CswIHcARPGyvFc4kNrLnOw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ADDC219253CC; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 17:15:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from oldenburg.str.redhat.com (unknown [10.39.192.82]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6583196E5; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 17:15:15 +0000 (UTC) From: Florian Weimer To: Adhemerval Zanella Cc: Joseph Myers , Lukasz Majewski , Carlos O'Donell , Andreas Schwab , libc-alpha Subject: Re: [PATCH] ci: Check for necessary Debian packages when running build-many-glibcs.py References: <20211108165255.15600-1-lukma@denx.de> Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2021 18:15:13 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Adhemerval Zanella's message of "Mon, 8 Nov 2021 14:06:47 -0300") Message-ID: <87fss6h8m6.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.23 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2021 17:15:38 -0000 * Adhemerval Zanella: >>> +def check_os_requirements(): >>> + if distro.id() == "debian" and distro.version() == "10": >>> + # List 'Debian' specific packages requirements (different than >>> + # vanila distro) to run this test without errors. >>> + debian_requirements = ['flex', 'bison', 'dnsutils', 'texinfo'] >> >> Why is dnsutils needed? > > Also, strictly to build and check 'texinfo' is not required either. I think binutils cannot be built without makeinfo. At least for somewhat older branches. If it's a problem, I should finally work out a fix for it. The makeinfo builds part of the cross-toolchain are fairly costly, too. Thanks, Florian