From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <fweimer@redhat.com>
Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com
 (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F5593954C76
 for <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>; Tue,  4 May 2021 13:13:23 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 2F5593954C76
Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com
 [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id
 us-mta-171-WWcjlY8LMAmeln1CqZnj9w-1; Tue, 04 May 2021 09:13:21 -0400
X-MC-Unique: WWcjlY8LMAmeln1CqZnj9w-1
Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com
 [10.5.11.22])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1BA78801817;
 Tue,  4 May 2021 13:13:20 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from oldenburg.str.redhat.com (ovpn-112-137.ams2.redhat.com
 [10.36.112.137])
 by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E99F010023AC;
 Tue,  4 May 2021 13:13:18 +0000 (UTC)
From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Cc: GNU C Library <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>,  Andreas Schwab
 <schwab@linux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] elf: Implement filtering of symbols historically defined
 in libpthread
References: <87h7jqguew.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com>
 <CAMe9rOoO3yY3Z1jNU6rYr6uLrNrtUqaj2YbLAc6WFh78E8H1DA@mail.gmail.com>
 <87k0oeln6s.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com>
 <CAMe9rOpD9s=uC9eaROChXy1waT3cbGiuedVNwXankp3qN03W4g@mail.gmail.com>
 <87wnsek7ku.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com>
 <CAMe9rOrryDZKxyr05EYjUgn4-wu_Ndu8wZZZVMGow4PU9+_TOA@mail.gmail.com>
 <87sg32k79x.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com>
 <CAMe9rOqu_UMY3vuG9C95iDoxvLj5eFsTYxo==JPKd9zFvnEKng@mail.gmail.com>
 <87lf8uk6u2.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com>
 <CAMe9rOrMVa7B3fjxWQAQxwdG0j6PCNOyR=-VvPr8NUW1w9WgiA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 04 May 2021 15:13:33 +0200
In-Reply-To: <CAMe9rOrMVa7B3fjxWQAQxwdG0j6PCNOyR=-VvPr8NUW1w9WgiA@mail.gmail.com>
 (H. J. Lu's message of "Tue, 4 May 2021 06:06:12 -0700")
Message-ID: <87fsz2k5fm.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.22
X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0
X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,
 DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,
 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,
 TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list <libc-alpha.sourceware.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/options/libc-alpha>,
 <mailto:libc-alpha-request@sourceware.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-alpha-request@sourceware.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/listinfo/libc-alpha>,
 <mailto:libc-alpha-request@sourceware.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 May 2021 13:13:24 -0000

* H. J. Lu:

> Why re-linking is needed for the binary executable test?

I don't want us to bundle the sources of an old glibc version, just to
comply with the LGPL requirements for one single test (or talk to legal
folks to figure out if this is required).

Thanks,
Florian