From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-1.mimecast.com [207.211.31.81]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BD973857018 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 18:59:48 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 7BD973857018 Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-47-TgsFx4dzNcK31E-Rr7ZH_A-1; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 14:59:26 -0400 X-MC-Unique: TgsFx4dzNcK31E-Rr7ZH_A-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E517C800C60 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 18:59:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from oldenburg2.str.redhat.com (ovpn-112-44.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.112.44]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 24EED5C1C5; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 18:59:22 +0000 (UTC) From: Florian Weimer To: Carlos O'Donell via Libc-alpha Subject: Re: Rename "master" branch to "main"? References: Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 20:59:20 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Carlos O'Donell via Libc-alpha's message of "Tue, 30 Jun 2020 14:10:13 -0400") Message-ID: <87h7usmlbr.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.16 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 18:59:49 -0000 * Carlos O'Donell via Libc-alpha: > My concern is that git, as a project, has not yet changed their default, I don't think this matters because the default branch during clone is set by the server. The default branch set by =E2=80=9Cgit init=E2=80=9D do= es not really matter to glibc development. Thanks, Florian