From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0B6338582A3 for ; Tue, 2 Jan 2024 10:28:02 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org F0B6338582A3 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org F0B6338582A3 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=170.10.129.124 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1704191287; cv=none; b=mvwW3cFEOSkiLxr7FibsYlvvWRm5N1zLIx4bId8TxWDqFmha8esvgWXAqvQgke2bu1A8CR75pzwtrsXiyWfdDlaf00zWhOjOWzPVFpk+KB39EdP1e05Q69JxU5N0hRnUyq7WM83vz/3oSe67PU00vCkNtxp6+M8+NXHQ/D4p3to= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1704191287; c=relaxed/simple; bh=cEVmSZeio2IRt8fE8BiclbdmpXNncYdnlD2iAU6wZcc=; h=DKIM-Signature:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=wGONlnpI8RlmiWXQ27XUH5xlMfgSFblTt1pjEXgGl8sqiSL43bghhtIiMQiNmqXvA9auVB1OWVuXsPH5G61UEWRw806vb6OAE6HpbblFMzPAHlY5eY+NPHHeO+IQQD+s/A6oMqfzAVVuwhg79j6kZf6ZsYD+pvtNBRJlPHtat4I= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1704191282; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=F0fXVIAIi1tSRxhE2PwYn3qUzQP64//1ssCwyOTTSgg=; b=LLKfXqbJmxQ6GkfhrmQgtYYvKsm2xepGZZVJZEsnzMn7BJTXzvDM0nSOaDxX4IIviO9dZH GKqDbZ9DTHgIHNIMJ2TSftJwWSGmIzBDqt4foD5IE8cu9ijYPdti2zgOG0rUjBCWnuW4Ru SjrGldQh6Zb5cA0hYg+xPDJod1aC3dA= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mx-ext.redhat.com [66.187.233.73]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-589-PVqcKwgJOfKC5kiOWSdKqw-1; Tue, 02 Jan 2024 05:28:01 -0500 X-MC-Unique: PVqcKwgJOfKC5kiOWSdKqw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.9]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0ECAF3C0E645; Tue, 2 Jan 2024 10:28:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from oldenburg.str.redhat.com (unknown [10.39.192.200]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 50224492BC6; Tue, 2 Jan 2024 10:28:00 +0000 (UTC) From: Florian Weimer To: "Andreas K. Huettel" Cc: libc-alpha@sourceware.org Subject: Re: autoconf 2.72 ? (Re: Happy New Year 2024 & Freeze for the upcoming glibc 2.39 release) References: <2652861.NG923GbCHz@noumea> <2945535.X9hSmTKtgW@noumea> Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2024 11:27:58 +0100 In-Reply-To: <2945535.X9hSmTKtgW@noumea> (Andreas K. Huettel's message of "Tue, 02 Jan 2024 10:21:46 +0100") Message-ID: <87il4c113l.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.11.54.9 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: * Andreas K. Huettel: > Am Montag, 1. Januar 2024, 14:18:01 CET schrieb Andreas K. Huettel: >> >> What else should we add here that still needs to go into 2.39? >> > > Given that it contains the fixes for recent C compilers, would updating > to autoconf 2.72 (released in november) make sense? > > I admit this is rather fresh, but otoh some advance planning makes sense here. > > I can regenerate and prepare a patch, but would definitely appreciate > more eyes on it then. Does it actually change the generated script much? Thanks, Florian