From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-out.m-online.net (mail-out.m-online.net [212.18.0.10]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF810383F87E for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 17:46:30 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org AF810383F87E Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux-m68k.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=whitebox@nefkom.net Received: from frontend01.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.182]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49wZfs3wRvz1rsXD; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 19:46:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (dynscan1.mnet-online.de [192.168.6.70]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49wZfs3Hf0z1qql4; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 19:46:29 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mnet-online.de Received: from mail.mnet-online.de ([192.168.8.182]) by localhost (dynscan1.mail.m-online.net [192.168.6.70]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jQGq8eyW5YRf; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 19:46:28 +0200 (CEST) X-Auth-Info: ypwcEm7UHJw4p3lN7xt2Py/y8LTD2V64bKq/en5Mxa0wshno8k2o/J/B4a8Dz4AB Received: from igel.home (ppp-46-244-182-174.dynamic.mnet-online.de [46.244.182.174]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 19:46:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: by igel.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2D3392C0B5E; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 19:46:28 +0200 (CEST) From: Andreas Schwab To: Florian Weimer Cc: Alistair Francis , Alistair Francis via Libc-alpha , Alistair Francis Subject: Re: [PATCH] Allow memset local PLT reference for RISC-V. References: <20200622211034.659739-1-alistair.francis@wdc.com> <87zh8u8d17.fsf@igel.home> <87o8p21bjh.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> <87366dx35x.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> <87v9j9yfh4.fsf@igel.home> <874kqtvlqt.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> X-Yow: Is this TERMINAL fun? Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 19:46:28 +0200 In-Reply-To: <874kqtvlqt.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> (Florian Weimer's message of "Mon, 29 Jun 2020 19:13:14 +0200") Message-ID: <87imf9ydcb.fsf@igel.home> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.91 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 17:46:32 -0000 On Jun 29 2020, Florian Weimer wrote: > But so far, the guidance has been *not* to rely on linker relaxation. This is RISC-V, it does everything through linker relaxation. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1 "And now for something completely different."