From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [63.128.21.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FBE93861018 for ; Wed, 9 Dec 2020 19:03:43 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 1FBE93861018 Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-408-NDyuGOUHONqZl7yQUDWotg-1; Wed, 09 Dec 2020 14:03:40 -0500 X-MC-Unique: NDyuGOUHONqZl7yQUDWotg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38509C28B; Wed, 9 Dec 2020 19:03:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from oldenburg2.str.redhat.com (ovpn-115-2.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.115.2]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 769F05C23E; Wed, 9 Dec 2020 19:03:38 +0000 (UTC) From: Florian Weimer To: Martin Sebor via Libc-alpha Subject: Re: tests failing on x86_64-linux References: <011327e1-276d-7ea5-460e-7838f94ee4c9@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2020 20:03:36 +0100 In-Reply-To: <011327e1-276d-7ea5-460e-7838f94ee4c9@gmail.com> (Martin Sebor via Libc-alpha's message of "Wed, 9 Dec 2020 11:17:22 -0700") Message-ID: <87k0tq4x9z.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.16 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2020 19:03:44 -0000 * Martin Sebor via Libc-alpha: > I've been seeing quite a few test failures in recent builds, more > than I used to in the past. Are those expected? I configure with > no options other than --prefix=/usr and after building without > installing (i.e., just make -j16) run make -j16 check. You have likely configured glibc without --prefix=/usr. As a result, the default search path does not include /usr/lib64, and required GCC components cannot be found. Maybe we should just default to that prefix (and the appropriate prefix for Hurd). It's a common trap. Thanks, Florian -- Red Hat GmbH, https://de.redhat.com/ , Registered seat: Grasbrunn, Commercial register: Amtsgericht Muenchen, HRB 153243, Managing Directors: Charles Cachera, Brian Klemm, Laurie Krebs, Michael O'Neill