From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <libc-alpha-return-104247-listarch-libc-alpha=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 46388 invoked by alias); 9 Aug 2019 07:15:23 -0000
Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <libc-alpha.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:libc-alpha-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 43338 invoked by uid 89); 9 Aug 2019 07:15:03 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-5.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=
X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com
From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
To: Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>
Cc: <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: Add feature test macro _ISOC2X_SOURCE
References: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1908090001480.5719@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2019 07:15:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1908090001480.5719@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
	(Joseph Myers's message of "Fri, 9 Aug 2019 00:03:38 +0000")
Message-ID: <87k1bm6c99.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-SW-Source: 2019-08/txt/msg00161.txt.bz2

* Joseph Myers:

> This patch does not itself enable anything new in the headers for C2X;
> that is to be done in followup patches.  (For example, most of the TS
> 18661-1 functions should be declared for C2X without any
> __STDC_WANT_IEC_60559_BFP_EXT__ being needed, but the ones that
> 18661-1 adds to Annex F because of their close relation to IEEE 754
> formats do still need the WANT macro in C2X.)

What happened to the plan to rename the TS 18661-1 functions?  Has a
formal decision been made?

Thanks,
Florian