From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <fweimer@redhat.com>
Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com
 (us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com [205.139.110.120])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B91C1386191F
 for <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 08:40:39 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org B91C1386191F
Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com
 [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id
 us-mta-148-DZBBYcViNdeXEdX61Ukp3g-1; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 04:40:16 -0400
X-MC-Unique: DZBBYcViNdeXEdX61Ukp3g-1
Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com
 [10.5.11.16])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7DED418FF667;
 Tue, 21 Jul 2020 08:40:15 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from oldenburg2.str.redhat.com (ovpn-112-90.ams2.redhat.com
 [10.36.112.90])
 by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA3C15C1BD;
 Tue, 21 Jul 2020 08:40:14 +0000 (UTC)
From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
To: Paul Zimmermann <Paul.Zimmermann@inria.fr>
Cc: libc-alpha@sourceware.org,  Vincent.Lefevre@ens-lyon.fr
Subject: Re: massive increase of the size of the library
References: <mwo8o9cm62.fsf@tomate.loria.fr>
 <87wo2xs28z.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com>
 <mwk0yxcljh.fsf@tomate.loria.fr>
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 10:40:13 +0200
In-Reply-To: <mwk0yxcljh.fsf@tomate.loria.fr> (Paul Zimmermann's message of
 "Tue, 21 Jul 2020 10:36:02 +0200")
Message-ID: <87lfjds1le.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.16
X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0
X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,
 DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,
 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,
 TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list <libc-alpha.sourceware.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://sourceware.org/mailman/options/libc-alpha>,
 <mailto:libc-alpha-request@sourceware.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-alpha-request@sourceware.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://sourceware.org/mailman/listinfo/libc-alpha>,
 <mailto:libc-alpha-request@sourceware.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 08:40:40 -0000

* Paul Zimmermann:

> sure, the files are here:
>
> https://members.loria.fr/PZimmermann/libc-2.28.a
> https://members.loria.fr/PZimmermann/libc-2.28.so
> https://members.loria.fr/PZimmermann/libc-2.29.a
> https://members.loria.fr/PZimmermann/libc-2.29.so

   text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	filename
1753624	  20968	  16408	1791000	 1b5418	libc-2.28.so
1758304	  20968	  16408	1795680	 1b6660	libc-2.29.so

So the actual code is of the same size.

The difference seems to be that the second file contains debugging
information:

$ strip libc-2.2?.so
$ ls -l libc-2.2?.so
-rw-rw-r--. 1 fweimer fweimer 1791400 Jul 21 10:39 libc-2.28.so
-rw-rw-r--. 1 fweimer fweimer 1791400 Jul 21 10:39 libc-2.29.so

So it must be a difference in your build environment.

Thanks,
Florian