From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF3543858D35 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2021 13:07:59 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org DF3543858D35 Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-126-RChF7pcaMM-wZP75hZIezA-1; Fri, 10 Dec 2021 08:07:58 -0500 X-MC-Unique: RChF7pcaMM-wZP75hZIezA-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9193B1023F4D; Fri, 10 Dec 2021 13:07:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from oldenburg.str.redhat.com (unknown [10.39.193.123]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA6801F3; Fri, 10 Dec 2021 13:07:49 +0000 (UTC) From: Florian Weimer To: Mark Wielaard Cc: DJ Delorie , Alexandra =?utf-8?B?SMOhamtvdsOh?= , libc-alpha@sourceware.org, ahajkova@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add valgrind smoke test References: Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2021 14:07:48 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Mark Wielaard's message of "Fri, 10 Dec 2021 13:56:41 +0100") Message-ID: <87mtl88v6j.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.23 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2021 13:08:01 -0000 * Mark Wielaard: > On Tue, 2021-12-07 at 15:32 -0500, DJ Delorie wrote: >> > +# Test whether valgrind is available in the test >> > +# environment. If not, skip the test. >> > +${test_wrapper_env} \ >> > +${run_program_env} \ >> > +$rtld --library-path "$library_path" \ >> > + /bin/sh -c 'command -v valgrind' || exit 77 >> >> Tested on bash, sh, and ksh - although 1003.2-1992 doesn't list >> "command" as a built-in. Not a problem; we don't support systems >> that old ;-) >> >> We run this script via $(SHELL), we should use $(SHELL) here too, not >> /bin/sh > > Can we rely on SHELL being defined here or should we pass that to the > test script too? SHELL isn't right for the test. It runs in a different environment. Hard-coding /bin/sh is the right thing to do (like we do in the system function, so it must already exist for many tests to work). Thanks, Florian