From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F03AA385E822 for ; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 09:31:02 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org F03AA385E822 Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-448-zR27lVctOoSPTyvLYhMb4w-1; Tue, 07 Sep 2021 05:31:01 -0400 X-MC-Unique: zR27lVctOoSPTyvLYhMb4w-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6B171854E2B; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 09:31:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from oldenburg.str.redhat.com (unknown [10.39.195.4]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A955360C9F; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 09:30:59 +0000 (UTC) From: Florian Weimer To: Adhemerval Zanella Cc: libc-alpha@sourceware.org, Nicolas Saenz Julienne Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] linux: Simplify get_nprocs References: <20210906181133.1401140-1-adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org> <20210906181133.1401140-3-adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org> Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2021 11:30:57 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20210906181133.1401140-3-adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org> (Adhemerval Zanella's message of "Mon, 6 Sep 2021 15:11:32 -0300") Message-ID: <87mtoovijy.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.12 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2021 09:31:04 -0000 * Adhemerval Zanella: > + /* This cannot use malloc because it is used on malloc initialization. */ > + enum { max_num_cpus = 32768 }; > + size_t cpu_bits_size = CPU_ALLOC_SIZE (max_num_cpus); > + __cpu_mask cpu_bits[cpu_bits_size / sizeof (__cpu_mask)]; I think cpu_bits_size should be an enum constant as well, to avoid creating a VLA. Thanks, Florian