From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-out.m-online.net (mail-out.m-online.net [212.18.0.9]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25D543857023 for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 08:21:58 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 25D543857023 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux-m68k.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=whitebox@nefkom.net Received: from frontend01.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.182]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ChW2D5ND9z1qs46; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 09:21:56 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (dynscan1.mnet-online.de [192.168.6.70]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ChW2D4M5lz1tlRp; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 09:21:56 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mnet-online.de Received: from mail.mnet-online.de ([192.168.8.182]) by localhost (dynscan1.mail.m-online.net [192.168.6.70]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WjLrAFcmc6jg; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 09:21:55 +0100 (CET) X-Auth-Info: BoGFObDpcb77I0k8y7AkhnJm+ThoGpJqUiMP6Wbk9EeoYxTsuvUb71RgxxktGuAW Received: from igel.home (ppp-46-244-163-84.dynamic.mnet-online.de [46.244.163.84]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 09:21:55 +0100 (CET) Received: by igel.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2EA672C3292; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 09:21:55 +0100 (CET) From: Andreas Schwab To: Carlos O'Donell via Libc-alpha Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Zack Weinberg , Cyril Hrubis , Carlos O'Donell , Andrei Vagin , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Dmitry Safonov Subject: Re: [Y2038][time namespaces] Question regarding CLOCK_REALTIME support plans in Linux time namespaces References: <20201030110229.43f0773b@jawa> <20201030135816.GA1790@yuki.lan> <87sg9vn40t.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> <72bbb207-b041-7710-98ad-b08579fe17e4@redhat.com> <87h7qbmqc3.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> <7bb5837f-1ff6-2b2c-089e-e2441d31ddb2@redhat.com> <87k0v7kwdc.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> <7a4d7b14-1f0b-4c40-2bd1-2582d8b71868@redhat.com> <87y2jej8mp.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> <87wnygopen.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> <5c382ef4-c505-5629-a85c-abae67c05c7c@redhat.com> <87pn41j7jx.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> <1d3d00ac-c7a0-7168-0450-8a0e1499ea2b@redhat.com> X-Yow: Did YOU find a DIGITAL WATCH in YOUR box of VELVEETA? Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 09:21:55 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1d3d00ac-c7a0-7168-0450-8a0e1499ea2b@redhat.com> (Carlos O'Donell via Libc-alpha's message of "Wed, 25 Nov 2020 22:05:30 -0500") Message-ID: <87mtz41qak.fsf@igel.home> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 08:22:00 -0000 On Nov 25 2020, Carlos O'Donell via Libc-alpha wrote: > We might write a syscall interception framework using seccomp > and SECCOMP_RET_TRACE, but that involves ptrace'ing the process > under test, and is equivalent to a micro-sandbox. I'm not against > that idea for testing; we would test what we ship. seccomp and ptrace does not work with qemu linux-user. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1 "And now for something completely different."