From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
To: John David Anglin <dave.anglin@bell.net>
Cc: Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com>,
GNU C Library <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>,
deller@kernel.org, Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>,
Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hppa: Optimize atomic_compare_and_exchange_val_acq
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 22:50:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87oa39vtxh.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <723790DF-7C85-4025-8087-AD0311DB1BA1@bell.net> (John David Anglin's message of "Tue, 27 Sep 2016 18:26:38 -0400")
* John David Anglin:
> On 2016-09-27, at 1:17 PM, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
>
>> Is the FAIL->PASS for tst-stack4 reliably tied to the addition of
>> this patch?
>
> I don't think so. It has something to do with testsuite. When I run
> test directly, it fails:
>
> dave@mx3210:~/gnu/glibc/objdir/nptl$ ./tst-stack4
> tst-stack4: tst-stack4.c:69: dso_process: Assertion `handle[dso]' failed.
> Didn't expect signal from child: got `Aborted'
>
>
> With gdb, I see:
>
> (gdb) r
Did you pass --direct? The test harness spawns a subprocess.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-27 22:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-22 14:14 John David Anglin
2016-09-22 20:37 ` Carlos O'Donell
2016-09-22 21:38 ` Helge Deller
2016-09-27 17:15 ` Carlos O'Donell
2016-09-22 21:49 ` John David Anglin
2016-09-23 7:13 ` Florian Weimer
2016-09-27 17:17 ` Carlos O'Donell
2016-09-27 22:26 ` John David Anglin
2016-09-27 22:50 ` Florian Weimer [this message]
2016-09-27 23:04 ` John David Anglin
2016-09-28 20:29 ` Carlos O'Donell
2016-09-28 21:00 ` Florian Weimer
2016-10-02 16:47 ` John David Anglin
2016-10-12 5:24 ` Carlos O'Donell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87oa39vtxh.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de \
--to=fw@deneb.enyo.de \
--cc=aurelien@aurel32.net \
--cc=carlos@redhat.com \
--cc=dave.anglin@bell.net \
--cc=deller@kernel.org \
--cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
--cc=vapier@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).