public inbox for libc-alpha@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
To: Adhemerval Zanella Netto <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>
Cc: libc-alpha@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] linux: Fix sys/mount.h usage with kernel headers
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2022 17:27:38 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87pmh89l05.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51eb6bd9-829a-9c3c-4191-2f511a86e276@linaro.org> (Adhemerval Zanella Netto's message of "Wed, 10 Aug 2022 11:57:14 -0300")

* Adhemerval Zanella Netto:

>>> diff --git a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/sys/mount.h b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/sys/mount.h
>>> index f965986ba8..ae8406838b 100644
>>> --- a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/sys/mount.h
>>> +++ b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/sys/mount.h
>>> @@ -27,6 +27,19 @@
>>>  #include <stddef.h>
>>>  #include <sys/ioctl.h>
>>>  
>>> +#ifdef __has_include
>>> +# if __has_include ("linux/mount.h")
>>> +#  include "linux/mount.h"
>>> +#  ifdef FSOPEN_CLOEXEC
>>> +#   define __mount_fsopen_cloexec_defined 1
>>> +#  endif
>>> +#  ifdef MOUNT_ATTR_SIZE_VER0
>>> +#   define __mount_attr_size_ver0_defined 1
>>> +#  endif
>>> +# endif
>>> +#endif
>> 
>> I think those __mount_ defines are not *that* useful.
>
> Not sure I am following, should I remove them? If so it would require
> some more ifdefs on their usage below.

Yes, basically check FSOPEN_CLOEXEC and MOUNT_ATTR_SIZE_VER0 directly.
It's required to get this to work without __has_include, if I'm not
mistkaen.

>>> +
>>> +#undef BLOCK_SIZE
>>>  #define BLOCK_SIZE	1024
>> 
>> If we don't have enum constants, should we #undef things?  If we
>> redefine as the same token as the kernel, there won't be a preprocessor
>> warning.
>
> This is required because of linux/fs.h (I caught it with the new testcase).
> Not sure if this is really required now that kernel is avoid including
> linux/mount.h on linux/fs.h.

Ah.  BLOCK_SIZE is special:

#define BLOCK_SIZE_BITS 10
#define BLOCK_SIZE (1<<BLOCK_SIZE_BITS)

So not 1024 and hence warning-prone.

But for the other definitions that use integer literals, we should
probably use the same literal as the kernel in our headers and not
#undef these constants (as an additional consistency check).

Thanks,
Florian


      reply	other threads:[~2022-08-10 15:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-09 17:22 Adhemerval Zanella
2022-08-09 17:43 ` Yann Droneaud
2022-08-09 18:51   ` Adhemerval Zanella Netto
2022-08-10  9:23 ` Florian Weimer
2022-08-10 14:57   ` Adhemerval Zanella Netto
2022-08-10 15:27     ` Florian Weimer [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87pmh89l05.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com \
    --to=fweimer@redhat.com \
    --cc=adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).