From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <fweimer@redhat.com>
Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124])
	by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 099E43858C2F
	for <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>; Thu, 25 Aug 2022 15:21:35 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 099E43858C2F
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com;
	s=mimecast20190719; t=1661440894;
	h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
	 to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
	 in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references;
	bh=Pvc6z2cbSFX6cZJl1fPMEjZzOxUp/+m8ZTivmtZmmZw=;
	b=K6r2zY4uB16+aoYuzrqtfyYnLEq6pO0t4e6e32uPgQ20V6/GEAlznyTUdTXdEVGXkwKt8z
	ILs9TioqBboYeduxYYyvD22agpOsv9lAOCSNEigGqtvEKFJpOd9g0g4i+UeylBjsXfYBUc
	HBjR3wf4c+zej09pBG0pEgLArzNRvZA=
Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mx3-rdu2.redhat.com
 [66.187.233.73]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS
 (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id
 us-mta-27-tJh0z6glNpmgyn_vhwclyA-1; Thu, 25 Aug 2022 11:21:31 -0400
X-MC-Unique: tJh0z6glNpmgyn_vhwclyA-1
Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.4])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5FF32919EB4;
	Thu, 25 Aug 2022 15:21:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from oldenburg.str.redhat.com (unknown [10.39.192.36])
	by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 462202026D4C;
	Thu, 25 Aug 2022 15:21:30 +0000 (UTC)
From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
To: Adhemerval Zanella Netto <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>
Cc: libc-alpha@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "Detect ld.so and libc.so version inconsistency
 during startup"
References: <87mtbsdfma.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com>
	<28ca2aac-11a9-0a6f-6974-ba1104ab121a@linaro.org>
	<8735dkbe6w.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com>
	<576e96ab-aedd-19d2-9909-94664c2356d0@linaro.org>
	<87y1vc9ycm.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com>
	<85b5446e-f4a5-c398-fba1-711ca9aa66a9@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2022 17:21:29 +0200
In-Reply-To: <85b5446e-f4a5-c398-fba1-711ca9aa66a9@linaro.org> (Adhemerval
	Zanella Netto's message of "Thu, 25 Aug 2022 12:04:30 -0300")
Message-ID: <87r1149wna.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 on 10.11.54.4
X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0
X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE,URIBL_BLACK autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org
List-Id: <libc-alpha.sourceware.org>

* Adhemerval Zanella Netto:

> Fair enough, I agree that breaking static dlopen sounds a big change. 

Should I push the revert then?

Thanks,
Florian