From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ADC9F3858D20 for ; Fri, 1 Sep 2023 11:53:00 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org ADC9F3858D20 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1693569180; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=KAnYBeB12v+0EueNcPz8FA/leAsyysfBys2jbG9imts=; b=J7BSejHOIlRDhwx/+wX4DnZ2Bu7V/Vhwsdi3yW5KMzsa0XctimPuT1EyqyXyDtyu+gRSMD 5sQ5DH3X54qGAa23c4l571NIg/H/JAmby0tBGFe968tBB3zvbLjWaVwHx1G1L4kxn8hps3 eY4sA8z9+xIA+69mkhXJCAY2c80mnm0= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mx-ext.redhat.com [66.187.233.73]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-359-PIvaeDJlOzqL9MKPoP_Gkg-1; Fri, 01 Sep 2023 07:52:57 -0400 X-MC-Unique: PIvaeDJlOzqL9MKPoP_Gkg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD2461C18C60; Fri, 1 Sep 2023 11:52:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from oldenburg.str.redhat.com (unknown [10.2.16.11]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5BCA493110; Fri, 1 Sep 2023 11:52:55 +0000 (UTC) From: Florian Weimer To: Mark Wielaard Cc: Sam James , Jakub Jelinek , Andreas Schwab , Joseph Myers , Maxim Kuvyrkov , libc-alpha@sourceware.org Subject: Re: dmarc, dkim and From rewriting References: <15af1715-3530-7c29-7595-5abe48c18e8b@cs.ucla.edu> <87ledqe8ej.fsf@gentoo.org> <87fs3yp91h.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> <877cpae033.fsf@gentoo.org> <20230901092133.GB22481@gnu.wildebeest.org> Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2023 13:52:54 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20230901092133.GB22481@gnu.wildebeest.org> (Mark Wielaard's message of "Fri, 1 Sep 2023 11:21:33 +0200") Message-ID: <87sf7ynm95.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.9 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: * Mark Wielaard: > Sorry this is being resolved slowly. But as you can see in the bug > progress is being made, we just upgraded our mailman instance again > last week. I had requested testers a couple of months ago [1], but > didn't get much/any response, so I thought this wasn't very urgent. I > think we are ready to switch the list to not use From rewriting for > lists that want that. We could test it next week? > [1] https://inbox.sourceware.org/libc-alpha/Y2GocuarFslwvb9j@wildebeest.org/ I read and comments in the vicinity as expressing a desire not to make the change (i.e., keep From: header rewriting) for compatibility with DKIM defaults in certain widely deploy free software MTAs. Thanks, Florian