From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A96B3858C62 for ; Mon, 14 Nov 2022 20:52:50 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 1A96B3858C62 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1668459169; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=CE5hCh7LuiA1eWLzsR+aoUWY2WVczU5pTY2EtJ1lso0=; b=gEXwrQZg3gOh/Vk6fV1CgYI2+4mxICHqf5OpEdy1VWlWM8dXDavZ9NDauOVTrZPyEvN8ee dkPYt9JdyH2ypaeGow/mkgkBxG3ukKH5TDGMym2WkC47koDsDmWsMPBDSD2a4sRZoN05Yl 8iZFYcEp3aAB8OjV0sav0H2aewWnkWs= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-322-dxRb2y3_M-yxjoz5ZWAsew-1; Mon, 14 Nov 2022 15:52:46 -0500 X-MC-Unique: dxRb2y3_M-yxjoz5ZWAsew-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ADE39101A52A; Mon, 14 Nov 2022 20:52:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from oldenburg.str.redhat.com (unknown [10.2.16.5]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85B132166B2B; Mon, 14 Nov 2022 20:52:43 +0000 (UTC) From: Florian Weimer To: Arsen =?utf-8?Q?Arsenovi=C4=87?= Cc: Adam Sampson , Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha , Sam James , autoconf@gnu.org, c-std-porting@lists.linux.dev, Zack Weinberg , David Seifert , Gentoo Toolchain , Paul Eggert , Frederic Berat Subject: Re: On time64 and Large File Support References: <87wn81q254.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> <86cz9puvf5.fsf@aarsen.me> Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 21:52:39 +0100 In-Reply-To: <86cz9puvf5.fsf@aarsen.me> ("Arsen =?utf-8?Q?Arsenovi=C4=87?= =?utf-8?Q?=22's?= message of "Mon, 14 Nov 2022 21:26:04 +0100") Message-ID: <87sfiltg14.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.6 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: * Arsen Arsenovi=C4=87: > Evening, > > Adam Sampson writes: >> If the consensus on this does come down to the definition of new >> architecture triplets, are there any other changes that should (or >> could) be made at the same time, beyond time64 and LFS? > > Forwarding a suggestion from Arfrever: >> Please consider making regoff_t 64-bit, on both 32-bit and 64-bit >> architectures. >> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D5945 >> https://wiki.musl-libc.org/functional-differences-from-glibc.html#Regula= r-expressions > > If an ABI break is inevitable, or a new ABI for the multilib setups, > this seems like a reasonable thing to include in it from my POV. Uhm, this seems to be something affecting 64-bit targets, not 32-bit targets, after the POSIX fix went in? We have a few more such quirks. (I understood the question to be about cleanup opportunities for 32-bit architectures.) Thanks, Florian