From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <fweimer@redhat.com>
Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com
 [205.139.110.120])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 899D93A1481C
 for <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 15:13:27 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 899D93A1481C
Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com
 [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id
 us-mta-240-6gLgkEZjNb2s7pp8Cr0Ktw-1; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 11:13:24 -0400
X-MC-Unique: 6gLgkEZjNb2s7pp8Cr0Ktw-1
Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com
 [10.5.11.23])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F17F11080;
 Fri, 17 Jul 2020 15:13:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from oldenburg2.str.redhat.com (ovpn-112-136.ams2.redhat.com
 [10.36.112.136])
 by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9114019C58;
 Fri, 17 Jul 2020 15:13:20 +0000 (UTC)
From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
To: Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com>
Cc: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>,
 "H.J. Lu via Libc-alpha" <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nptl: Zero-extend arguments to SETXID syscalls [BZ #26248]
References: <20200716112651.2257283-1-hjl.tools@gmail.com>
 <87o8ofy8e7.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com>
 <CAMe9rOo8K3D+pNabZy+F6wKkT-N2M64eNASOFpq5uK9Ghnq86Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <56cafa21-37ea-b39e-8c84-afb258f0d17a@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2020 17:13:19 +0200
In-Reply-To: <56cafa21-37ea-b39e-8c84-afb258f0d17a@redhat.com> (Carlos
 O'Donell's message of "Fri, 17 Jul 2020 11:01:40 -0400")
Message-ID: <87sgdqp434.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.23
X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0
X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,
 DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,
 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,
 TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list <libc-alpha.sourceware.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://sourceware.org/mailman/options/libc-alpha>,
 <mailto:libc-alpha-request@sourceware.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-alpha-request@sourceware.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://sourceware.org/mailman/listinfo/libc-alpha>,
 <mailto:libc-alpha-request@sourceware.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2020 15:13:29 -0000

* Carlos O'Donell:

> This test should run in a container, and it should attempt two setgroups
> calls, one with groups and one empty with a bad address.

Why do you think this needs a container?

Thanks,
Florian