From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18E993858C2D for ; Tue, 16 Aug 2022 09:51:15 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 18E993858C2D Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mx3-rdu2.redhat.com [66.187.233.73]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-621-wvLoUBNyNx66auw_ofUgZg-1; Tue, 16 Aug 2022 05:51:13 -0400 X-MC-Unique: wvLoUBNyNx66auw_ofUgZg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44315299E76E; Tue, 16 Aug 2022 09:51:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from oldenburg.str.redhat.com (unknown [10.39.192.98]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80506140EBE3; Tue, 16 Aug 2022 09:51:12 +0000 (UTC) From: Florian Weimer To: Andreas Schwab Cc: Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha Subject: Re: [PATCH] Linux: Fix enum fsconfig_command detection in References: <87a684ejbj.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2022 11:51:10 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Andreas Schwab's message of "Tue, 16 Aug 2022 11:44:34 +0200") Message-ID: <87tu6ccy9d.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.85 on 10.11.54.7 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2022 09:51:16 -0000 * Andreas Schwab: > On Aug 16 2022, Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha wrote: > >> The #ifdef FSOPEN_CLOEXEC check did not work because the macro >> was defined prior to its use. > > This is confusing, since generally we want macros to be defined before > their use. What's important here is that the use is about checking for > absence of the macro in the kernel header. Do you suggest to reword the commit message? What about this? =E2=80=9C The #ifdef FSOPEN_CLOEXEC check did not work because the macro was always defined in this header prior to the check, so that the contents did not matter. =E2=80=9D Thanks, Florian