From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8071 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2016 12:36:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 8056 invoked by uid 89); 27 Nov 2016 12:36:30 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=1756, 8276, 942b, 54C7 X-HELO: mail-out.m-online.net X-Auth-Info: TfkFXSTqHVM0CnOeXgXLg9zVyC074Wfxnrbx7G9FXbThvkqZAkMUsMoyw02fD9oA From: Andreas Schwab To: Florian Weimer Cc: Torvald Riegel , GNU C Library Subject: Re: __HAVE_64B_ATOMICS and alignment References: <430bd9b7-a6fd-7247-7b60-965bd0486bbf@redhat.com> <87mvgmneuc.fsf@linux-m68k.org> X-Yow: Just to have MORE FUN, I'll pretend I am JAMES CAGNEY and I am having a tense, UP-TIGHT EXPERIENCE!! Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2016 12:36:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Florian Weimer's message of "Sun, 27 Nov 2016 12:33:43 +0100") Message-ID: <87twatkslc.fsf@linux-m68k.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2016-11/txt/msg00969.txt.bz2 On Nov 27 2016, Florian Weimer wrote: > But shouldn't this work out of the box, i.e., with the generic sem_t, you > get something that is usable whether __HAVE_64B_ATOMICS is defined or not? Alignment is inherently archtecture dependent. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."