From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D1C83858C50 for ; Mon, 11 Mar 2024 13:19:07 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 6D1C83858C50 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 6D1C83858C50 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=170.10.129.124 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1710163148; cv=none; b=H9YoB2MCnQ6/eGSj8+U1rZ8g2X12chWFeZNFHoks4mTwF7McVkMSFJscIds/3lSDodTqqArFG2HTkF+31nb8XtGaVvfz8uhKj7dx0QngHyJ8Q8O82ATylV3AproxzBq2VwQfmL2YLjjA60fRZ0iBHC1kueKG3O4/61vgOmIAKE4= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1710163148; c=relaxed/simple; bh=fdorHCyiz+rRx4apPG3FcOQMA85DQD2mZUs4nM6AKWg=; h=DKIM-Signature:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=TVrqPdB9HSovtw5iE+msyBYelAQfatCXSwpmWdbSOK6bikdKj2Gl01Pr1gfCjzPxNVZwnNHmSnWTjlM7Esc64+VWPOaQruXdgwIhxMX0b533mRpnFK4HixQYMvDD9X4QaQCbCE5TjWfwtsfvGSuKAi3O48zjaF7gGsCpKTYK0mI= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1710163147; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=F4A5ocOEeyJaXHHuc2iO1JtF047+x4B0bmprzhdUw3I=; b=HypFThqwMyL8F3yvjoutLrPzUPMdeaz+4Apbcfrg3PKzcC7Nme1CjhijMVVAvZrd8lseb+ h7h28xAdU1PxTnWCA/JfCTdR6+m0vIHdmjBPuM+IMHaj/FeW6o2OqUdMNat7isw1Ch+4St phctw6EZG9nNBJcymXepLUQ8ZjXk6rU= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mx-ext.redhat.com [66.187.233.73]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-571-GC3dAk0tObeBpM9VfaK__A-1; Mon, 11 Mar 2024 09:19:05 -0400 X-MC-Unique: GC3dAk0tObeBpM9VfaK__A-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.6]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 79B5338157BA for ; Mon, 11 Mar 2024 13:19:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from oldenburg.str.redhat.com (unknown [10.39.192.78]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F57D2166AE5 for ; Mon, 11 Mar 2024 13:19:04 +0000 (UTC) From: Florian Weimer To: libc-alpha@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] riscv: Update nofpu libm test ulps References: Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 14:19:03 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Darius Rad's message of "Wed, 6 Mar 2024 13:08:05 -0500") Message-ID: <87v85soqig.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.11.54.6 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,GIT_PATCH_0,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: * Darius Rad: > Fix two test failures. > --- > Changes since v1: > - Rebase to master > - Fix corrupted diff line in patch > > sysdeps/riscv/nofpu/libm-test-ulps | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/sysdeps/riscv/nofpu/libm-test-ulps b/sysdeps/riscv/nofpu/libm-test-ulps > index 16106f10b0..bc7e615177 100644 > --- a/sysdeps/riscv/nofpu/libm-test-ulps > +++ b/sysdeps/riscv/nofpu/libm-test-ulps > @@ -1043,6 +1043,7 @@ ldouble: 8 > > Function: "hypot": > double: 1 > +float: 1 > ldouble: 1 > > Function: "hypot_downward": Looks okay. Reviewed-by: Florian Weimer Do you have sourceware commit access? If not, I can push the change for you. (ULP updates like this can also be pushed without review as obvious, I think.) Thanks, Florian