From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3090A3858C53 for ; Wed, 14 Jun 2023 11:47:04 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 3090A3858C53 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1686743223; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=MiMbK+tJjqr4PU97vx1YUhTkYizxWPSJ61RmKHj7qGw=; b=fMlhMZZZYXVkXnjSWDAjjKlJWMyPaNdgrKyQ6zsXW0UKHHdCKpAKTbft5Qy/7UdsXsLNLZ DSmIS640LrGVi1Hr6/S7UQ3XMHtsrbq+zvT2c9rh2NZTvtYhPxYsVEpi/wPTrZZ9801EEy ydS6JqaboHMNQdGCQ/g/a/gmy3Uzr14= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-662-88_YjEf5MNKoPUf9Vr6gyQ-1; Wed, 14 Jun 2023 07:47:00 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 88_YjEf5MNKoPUf9Vr6gyQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30300811E78; Wed, 14 Jun 2023 11:47:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from oldenburg.str.redhat.com (unknown [10.2.16.2]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6D6EFFE1; Wed, 14 Jun 2023 11:46:58 +0000 (UTC) From: Florian Weimer To: Paul Eggert Cc: Jakub Jelinek , Joseph Myers , Marek Polacek , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, libc-alpha@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Add stdckdint.h header for C23 References: <68578b43-939-1879-9676-2ea55249a2c5@codesourcery.com> Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2023 13:46:56 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Paul Eggert's message of "Tue, 13 Jun 2023 19:54:25 -0700") Message-ID: <87v8fqp8pb.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.5 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,KAM_NUMSUBJECT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: * Paul Eggert: > I don't see how you could implement __has_include_next() > for arbitrary non-GCC compilers, which is what we'd need for glibc > users. This is not a requirement for glibc in general. For example, only works with compilers to which it has been ported. Thanks, Florian