From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from albireo.enyo.de (albireo.enyo.de [37.24.231.21]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8FE23386101D for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 15:58:47 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 8FE23386101D Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=deneb.enyo.de Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=fw@deneb.enyo.de Received: from [172.17.203.2] (helo=deneb.enyo.de) by albireo.enyo.de with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) id 1k8mxg-0002lh-98; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 15:58:44 +0000 Received: from fw by deneb.enyo.de with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1k8mxg-0007wB-5K; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 17:58:44 +0200 From: Florian Weimer To: Max Gautier Cc: Max Gautier via Libc-alpha Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] iconv: module for MODIFIED-UTF-7 References: <20200819230702.229822-1-mg@max.gautier.name> <87y2m9agmm.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <20200820151956.GA231892@ol-mgautier.localdomain> Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2020 17:58:44 +0200 Message-ID: <87v9hd8g23.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, KAM_NUMSUBJECT, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2020 15:58:49 -0000 * Max Gautier: > Florian Weimer: >> * Max Gautier via Libc-alpha: >> >> > I am unaware of an official name for the encoding, so I used >> > "MODIFIED-UTF-7". There might be better choices, if someone has insights >> > on that. >> >> Let's try to get it added to the IANA registry? It's odd that a >> charset defined in an RFC is not already contained in it. >> >> The contact information for the registry seems to have atrophied a >> bit. I will try to figure out the current process. Historically, >> it's been Expert Review, so we shouldn't have to write an RFC for >> this. > > Is the list here (and the linked RFC) not accurate ? > > [1]: https://www.iana.org/assignments/charset-info/charset-info.xhtml I tried to subscribe earlier today, but have yet to receive a response from the mailing list software.