From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from hedgehog.birch.relay.mailchannels.net (hedgehog.birch.relay.mailchannels.net [23.83.209.81]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D39A385801A for ; Wed, 12 May 2021 19:24:30 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 0D39A385801A X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|tuliom@ascii.art.br Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA73F482127; Wed, 12 May 2021 19:24:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a39.g.dreamhost.com (100-101-162-41.trex.outbound.svc.cluster.local [100.101.162.41]) (Authenticated sender: dreamhost) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 0FA7A481D6B; Wed, 12 May 2021 19:24:28 +0000 (UTC) X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|tuliom@ascii.art.br Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a39.g.dreamhost.com (pop.dreamhost.com [64.90.62.162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384) by 100.101.162.41 (trex/6.2.1); Wed, 12 May 2021 19:24:28 +0000 X-MC-Relay: Neutral X-MailChannels-SenderId: dreamhost|x-authsender|tuliom@ascii.art.br X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: dreamhost X-Keen-Spill: 4fbe92ee084d8ccd_1620847468765_290624494 X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1620847468765:3177804340 X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1620847468765 Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a39.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a39.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF8F97FE5F; Wed, 12 May 2021 12:24:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ascii.art.br (unknown [187.1.54.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: tuliom@ascii.art.br) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a39.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 818037FDFB; Wed, 12 May 2021 12:24:25 -0700 (PDT) X-DH-BACKEND: pdx1-sub0-mail-a39 From: Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho To: Florian Weimer Cc: "Lucas A. M. Magalhaes" , libc-alpha@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] powerpc64le: Check HWCAP bits against compiler build flags In-Reply-To: <878s4jrhg1.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> References: <162076753769.316372.10532385586864995177@fedora.local> <87im3owe4q.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> <871racxavs.fsf@linux.ibm.com> <878s4jrhg1.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.31.3 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/27.2 (x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Date: Wed, 12 May 2021 16:24:21 -0300 Message-ID: <87y2cjwyai.fsf@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, RCVD_IN_BARRACUDACENTRAL, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 May 2021 19:24:32 -0000 Florian Weimer writes: > I think we should require it if it is part of -mcpu=power10. This check > is not just for glibc code, but for entire distributions using > consistent build flags across everything. If they don't want MMA for > some reason, they will have to build wuth -mno-mmma. OK. Good point. I agree. Thanks! -- Tulio Magno