From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-out.m-online.net (mail-out.m-online.net [212.18.0.10]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 98579385703D for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2020 07:32:24 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 98579385703D Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux-m68k.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=whitebox@nefkom.net Received: from frontend01.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.182]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49xXxM3lSLz1rtN6; Wed, 1 Jul 2020 09:32:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (dynscan1.mnet-online.de [192.168.6.70]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49xXxM3XW9z1r56y; Wed, 1 Jul 2020 09:32:23 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mnet-online.de Received: from mail.mnet-online.de ([192.168.8.182]) by localhost (dynscan1.mail.m-online.net [192.168.6.70]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w5FNND3bzzVr; Wed, 1 Jul 2020 09:32:22 +0200 (CEST) X-Auth-Info: rI7IA4+sLDItmYKCsIpguJBKkTZ9bmXf3oxMUHY+d8V73DSKtgSVNY10GRONiHQw Received: from igel.home (ppp-46-244-162-239.dynamic.mnet-online.de [46.244.162.239]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Wed, 1 Jul 2020 09:32:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: by igel.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5AA762C111E; Wed, 1 Jul 2020 09:32:22 +0200 (CEST) From: Andreas Schwab To: Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha Cc: Florian Weimer Subject: Re: Why does pthread_mutex_destroy check for an in-use mutex? References: <87lfk3lpx5.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> X-Yow: Kids, the seven basic food groups are GUM, PUFF PASTRY, PIZZA, PESTICIDES, ANTIBIOTICS, NUTRA-SWEET and MILK DUDS!! Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2020 09:32:22 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87lfk3lpx5.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> (Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha's message of "Wed, 01 Jul 2020 08:17:42 +0200") Message-ID: <87y2o3d721.fsf@igel.home> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.91 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2020 07:32:25 -0000 On Jul 01 2020, Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha wrote: > This check does not seem to be mandated by POSIX. As far as I can see, > it is the only place where __nusers is actually used. Is __nusers actually updated in the elision path? Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1 "And now for something completely different."