From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
To: Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Linux: Add execveat system call wrapper
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 14:55:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87y2qdku94.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b5af6b41-7bd8-3ff6-cf29-56bddd0ddd45@linaro.org> (Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha's message of "Thu, 30 Apr 2020 09:28:26 -0300")
* Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha:
>> So I think we have to do this:
>>
>> * If there are more flags than just the two, fail with EINVAL.
>>
>> * To handle AT_EMPTY_PATH, do not open a new file descriptor (using
>> openat) if AT_EMPTY_PATH is specified *and* the file name is "".
>>
>> * To handle AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW, openat needs to be called with
>> O_NOFOLLOW in that case (in addition to O_CLOEXEC).
>
> These will surely need to be on the testcase.
Yes, these permutations need to be tested.
>> The behavior with AT_EMPTY_PATH/"" and AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW at the same
>> time is not immedately obvious from the kernel code, so I wrote a small
>> test program (/bin/sh is a symbolic link to /bin/bash on this system):
>>
>> #include <err.h>
>> #include <fcntl.h>
>> #include <sys/syscall.h>
>> #include <unistd.h>
>>
>> int
>> main (void)
>> {
>> int fd = open ("/bin/sh", O_PATH | O_NOFOLLOW);
>> if (fd < 0)
>> err (1, "open");
>> static char *const argv[] = { "sh", "-c", "exit 0", NULL };
>> static char *const envp[] = { NULL };
>> syscall (SYS_execveat, fd, "", argv, envp,
>> AT_EMPTY_PATH | AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW);
>> err (1, "execveat");
>> }
>>
>> This fails:
>>
>> openat(AT_FDCWD, "/bin/sh", O_RDONLY|O_NOFOLLOW|O_PATH) = 3
>> execveat(3, "", ["sh", "-c", "exit 0"], 0x402040 /* 0 vars */, AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW|AT_EMPTY_PATH) = -1 ELOOP (Too many levels of symbolic links)
>> […]
>> execveat-opath-symlink: execveat: Too many levels of symbolic links
>>
>> So I think for the AT_EMPTY_PATH/"" and AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW case, we
>> need to call fstatat64 with AT_EMPTY_PATH and see if st_mode indicates
>> that the descriptor refers to a symbolic link. If it does, the function
>> needs to fail with ELOOP.
>
> I think execve would handle it:
>
> openat(AT_FDCWD, "/bin/sh", O_RDONLY|O_NOFOLLOW|O_PATH) = 3
> execve("/proc/self/fd/3", ["sh", "-c", "echo test"], 0x556815e580a8 /* 0 vars */) = -1 ELOOP (Too many levels of symbolic links)
And execveat fails even without AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW:
openat(AT_FDCWD, "/bin/sh", O_RDONLY|O_NOFOLLOW|O_PATH) = 3
execveat(3, "", ["sh", "-c", "exit 0"], 0x402040 /* 0 vars */, AT_EMPTY_PATH) = -1 ELOOP (Too many levels of symbolic links)
Does this mean we do not need a special case for an O_PATH|O_NOFOLLOW
open of a symbolic link?
Thanks,
Florian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-30 12:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-28 12:20 Alexandra Hájková
2020-04-28 14:17 ` Florian Weimer
2020-04-28 15:03 ` Joseph Myers
2020-04-28 15:03 ` Joseph Myers
2020-04-28 15:08 ` Florian Weimer
2020-04-28 15:29 ` Joseph Myers
2020-04-28 17:15 ` Florian Weimer
2020-04-28 17:19 ` Joseph Myers
2020-04-28 17:44 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2020-04-28 17:50 ` Florian Weimer
2020-04-28 18:31 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2020-04-30 11:15 ` Florian Weimer
2020-04-30 12:28 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2020-04-30 12:55 ` Florian Weimer [this message]
2020-04-30 19:03 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2020-04-30 12:32 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2020-11-06 21:03 ` Alexandra Hájková
2020-11-06 22:15 ` Joseph Myers
2020-11-09 18:43 ` Florian Weimer
2020-11-09 21:34 ` Yann Droneaud
2020-11-26 11:31 ` Alexandra Petlanova Hajkova
2020-11-09 20:39 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2020-12-03 13:55 ` Florian Weimer
2020-11-26 21:28 ` Alexandra Hájková
2020-11-27 14:58 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2020-11-27 17:32 ` Florian Weimer
2020-11-27 17:38 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2020-12-03 14:20 ` Alexandra Hájková
2020-12-03 14:37 ` Andreas Schwab
2020-12-08 14:44 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2020-12-08 15:18 ` Florian Weimer
2020-12-08 16:41 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2021-03-15 21:42 ` Alexandra Hájková
2021-03-15 22:12 ` Joseph Myers
2021-03-15 22:17 ` Dmitry V. Levin
2021-03-24 13:54 ` Alexandra Hájková
2021-03-26 20:36 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2021-04-02 12:13 ` Alexandra Hájková
2021-04-02 13:29 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2021-04-05 16:32 ` Alexandra Hájková
2021-04-12 10:26 ` Alexandra Hájková
2021-04-12 11:14 ` Andreas Schwab
2021-04-12 19:26 ` Alexandra Hájková
2021-04-13 19:27 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2021-04-21 18:11 ` Alexandra Hájková
2021-05-03 19:20 ` Adhemerval Zanella
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87y2qdku94.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com \
--to=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).