From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 69680 invoked by alias); 21 Jun 2018 01:08:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 69668 invoked by uid 89); 21 Jun 2018 01:08:41 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,URIBL_RED autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com From: Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho To: Joseph Myers Cc: libc-alpha@sourceware.org, "Gabriel F. T. Gomes" Cc: Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/12] ldbl-128ibm-compat: Provide nexttoward functions In-Reply-To: References: <20180620020426.20372-1-tuliom@linux.ibm.com> <20180620020426.20372-10-tuliom@linux.ibm.com> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.25 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/25.3.1 (x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 01:08:00 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 18062101-0004-0000-0000-000014581DBA X-IBM-SpamModules-Scores: X-IBM-SpamModules-Versions: BY=3.00009230; HX=3.00000241; KW=3.00000007; PH=3.00000004; SC=3.00000265; SDB=6.01049958; UDB=6.00538039; IPR=6.00828930; MB=3.00021769; MTD=3.00000008; XFM=3.00000015; UTC=2018-06-21 01:08:36 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 18062101-0005-0000-0000-000087D0821C Message-Id: <87y3f99ca7.fsf@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2018-06-20_12:,, signatures=0 X-SW-Source: 2018-06/txt/msg00651.txt.bz2 Joseph Myers writes: > On Tue, 19 Jun 2018, Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho wrote: > >> __nexttowardieee128 (as an alias to __nextafterieee128) > > Is there an advantage to having this alias over having another #define in > math.h like those used for drem and gamma? No. However, changing it breaks math/test-tgmath.c as it defines its own nextafterl and nexttowardl in the same compilation unit, causing the assembler to fail with: /tmp/ccE9ypFK.s: Assembler messages: /tmp/ccE9ypFK.s:22067: Error: symbol `__nextafterieee128' is already defined Any suggestions on how to proceed? -- Tulio Magno