From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A5B43858426 for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2023 09:30:54 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 1A5B43858426 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1696584653; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=pKIfBLf3w0+LnpPIir2RbOqnem90eAa2REb1t6MF3r8=; b=DuwyN73sEC735YzRcjLDBkOAJCVmqBA1cWrVpebiGFmQspswbz2pbAspWVOmWB5fQJlJav QE+dffzJ7kpL3QnqbJR5zI8aXknItblSMRCVb1t9/7Ic24p+AkWuDywjx1vmiqO83aq1qG O9YBlz4pljbpDf1+VU2Ep50JNgGiQxY= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mx-ext.redhat.com [66.187.233.73]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-680-9bVsSbZMMtyQXjjnpyL5Vw-1; Fri, 06 Oct 2023 05:30:52 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 9bVsSbZMMtyQXjjnpyL5Vw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5BF641C2B689; Fri, 6 Oct 2023 09:30:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from oldenburg.str.redhat.com (unknown [10.2.16.57]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF8A510CD658; Fri, 6 Oct 2023 09:30:51 +0000 (UTC) From: Florian Weimer To: "Andreas K. Huettel" Cc: libc-alpha@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Revert "elf: Always call destructors in reverse constructor order (bug 30785)" References: <14293037.dW097sEU6C@noumea> Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2023 11:30:50 +0200 In-Reply-To: <14293037.dW097sEU6C@noumea> (Andreas K. Huettel's message of "Fri, 06 Oct 2023 11:25:23 +0200") Message-ID: <87zg0wf67p.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.3 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: * Andreas K. Huettel: > Am Freitag, 6. Oktober 2023, 11:21:24 CEST schrieb Florian Weimer: >> The change does not work with existing applications. >> > > I guess we want to revert this on the release branches then too? Yes. 8-( The application brokenness was actually reported against glibc 2.37. I have an idea for a more conservative fix (the reverse constructor order did fix another application, after all), but that will have to undergo downstream testing before a backport. Thanks, Florian