From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Received: from albireo.enyo.de (albireo.enyo.de [37.24.231.21])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB352385840C;
 Fri,  8 Oct 2021 15:39:34 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org DB352385840C
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org;
 dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=deneb.enyo.de
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=deneb.enyo.de
Received: from [172.17.203.2] (port=52529 helo=deneb.enyo.de)
 by albireo.enyo.de ([172.17.140.2]) with esmtps
 (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 id 1mYry8-0003FI-Ib; Fri, 08 Oct 2021 15:39:32 +0000
Received: from fw by deneb.enyo.de with local (Exim 4.94.2)
 (envelope-from <fw@deneb.enyo.de>)
 id 1mYry8-000U6A-97; Fri, 08 Oct 2021 17:39:32 +0200
From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
To: Fangrui Song via Libc-alpha <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
Cc: Fangrui Song <maskray@google.com>,  binutils@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] elf: Support DT_RELR relative relocation format [BZ
 #27924]
References: <20211008065740.1485737-1-maskray@google.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2021 17:39:32 +0200
In-Reply-To: <20211008065740.1485737-1-maskray@google.com> (Fangrui Song via
 Libc-alpha's message of "Thu, 7 Oct 2021 23:57:40 -0700")
Message-ID: <87zgrjy18r.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS,
 KAM_SHORT, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,
 TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list <libc-alpha.sourceware.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/options/libc-alpha>,
 <mailto:libc-alpha-request@sourceware.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-alpha-request@sourceware.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/listinfo/libc-alpha>,
 <mailto:libc-alpha-request@sourceware.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2021 15:39:36 -0000

* Fangrui Song via Libc-alpha:

> @@ -887,7 +893,10 @@ typedef struct
>  #define DT_PREINIT_ARRAY 32		/* Array with addresses of preinit fct*/
>  #define DT_PREINIT_ARRAYSZ 33		/* size in bytes of DT_PREINIT_ARRAY */
>  #define DT_SYMTAB_SHNDX	34		/* Address of SYMTAB_SHNDX section */
> -#define	DT_NUM		35		/* Number used */
> +#define DT_RELRSZ	35
> +#define DT_RELR		36
> +#define DT_RELRENT	37
> +#define	DT_NUM		38		/* Number used */
>  #define DT_LOOS		0x6000000d	/* Start of OS-specific */
>  #define DT_HIOS		0x6ffff000	/* End of OS-specific */
>  #define DT_LOPROC	0x70000000	/* Start of processor-specific */

<http://www.sco.com/developers/gabi/latest/ch5.dynamic.html#tag_encodings>
(Figure 5-10: Dynamic Array Tags, d_tag) still ends at 34, and I'm
worried about collisions with these numbers.

Do you know what the official allocation status for the new constants
is?