From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18490384800A for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 18:29:57 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 18490384800A Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-406-n1ryQcGzPFCsfXXiaOW3vw-1; Wed, 09 Jun 2021 14:29:55 -0400 X-MC-Unique: n1ryQcGzPFCsfXXiaOW3vw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 27F6BEEB98; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 18:29:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from oldenburg.str.redhat.com (ovpn-115-60.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.115.60]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E1AF5944E; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 18:29:13 +0000 (UTC) From: Florian Weimer To: Vivek =?utf-8?Q?Das=C2=A0Mohapatra?= via Libc-alpha Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v11 0/7] Implementation of RTLD_SHARED for dlmopen References: <20210609171618.20674-1-vivek@collabora.com> Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2021 20:29:12 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20210609171618.20674-1-vivek@collabora.com> ("Vivek =?utf-8?Q?Das=C2=A0Mohapatra?= via Libc-alpha"'s message of "Wed, 9 Jun 2021 18:16:11 +0100") Message-ID: <87zgvy3n9j.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.11 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2021 18:29:58 -0000 * Vivek Das=C2=A0Mohapatra via Libc-alpha: > - libpthread still has the new section applied as I'm not 100% sure it d= oesn't > still need this treatment. I would like to investigate further before > removing the new section from libpthread. libpthread does not need this anymore. We can safely load it as many times as we want. librt still needs it because it's not empty and has global state (for handling the thread notifications). Thanks, Florian