public inbox for libc-alpha@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>
To: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
Cc: libc-alpha@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Linux: Consolidate auxiliary vector parsing (redo)
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:00:06 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8da69301-2650-a38d-2e96-665a7ba14c8d@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ee4563t9.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com>



On 14/02/2022 09:16, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Adhemerval Zanella:
> 
>> I still think this approach is still fragile since we don't how if this
>> will be the only optimization option gcc will make loops to memset. We 
>> already have a similar problem on _dl_start, but it is slight different
>> since the clear memory should be done before self-relocation. Also for 
>> memset.c itself there is no much we can do, so we need to resort on 
>> -fno-tree-loop-distribute-patterns.
>>
>> However in this case I think it would be better to avoid hacking the
>> compiler and expect it does not generate broken code and instead assume
>> memset *might* be generate and work around it.  We already have the
>> hack on sysdeps/generic/symbol-hacks.h, so I think we should do something
>> similiar:
>>
>>   1. Add a __memset_generic internal symbol on all ports to avoid the
>>      iFUNC plt (which seems to be cause of this issue).
>>
>>   2. Add a symbol redirection to call such symbol when required (most
>>      likely in the dl-start.h as H.J has suggested.
>>
>> So we don't need to handle this specific issue everytime we hack into
>> the loader code.
> 
> But this isn't a new problem, right?
> 
> I also don't think an assembler-based symbol redirect is more portable
> than -fno-tree-loop-distribute-patterns.  We need to build these parts
> with -ffreestanding, and we need a portable way (across GCC and Clang)
> to redirect the four required functions ('memcpy', 'memmove', 'memset'
> and 'memcmp', according to the GCC manual).

I don't think -ffreestanding will help much in this specific issue.  The
problem is mainly that for some architectures, memcpy, memmove, memset,
and memcmp might be implemented as a iFUNC and it might no be relocated
at the time of the call.  At least redirecting the calls to internal
symbols avoid this specific issue.

      reply	other threads:[~2022-02-14 13:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-11 20:33 Florian Weimer
2022-02-14  8:27 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2022-02-14 10:10   ` Florian Weimer
2022-02-14 11:44 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2022-02-14 12:16   ` Florian Weimer
2022-02-14 13:00     ` Adhemerval Zanella [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8da69301-2650-a38d-2e96-665a7ba14c8d@linaro.org \
    --to=adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org \
    --cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).