From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gnu.wildebeest.org (wildebeest.demon.nl [212.238.236.112]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 27338396EC44 for ; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 13:38:56 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 27338396EC44 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=klomp.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=mark@klomp.org Received: from tarox.wildebeest.org (tarox.wildebeest.org [172.31.17.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gnu.wildebeest.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 49D6937251C8; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 14:38:54 +0100 (CET) Received: by tarox.wildebeest.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 065E4413CB2B; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 14:38:54 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <8f82dae5a97f9ac763e9239703c4ad760f82bf14.camel@klomp.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] elf: Synchronize section header flags with binutils From: Mark Wielaard To: Florian Weimer , libc-alpha@sourceware.org Cc: Nick Clifton Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2020 14:38:53 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87eek710yz.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> References: <87eek710yz.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Evolution 3.28.5 (3.28.5-10.el7) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2020 13:38:59 -0000 Hi Florian, On Thu, 2020-12-03 at 14:19 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > binutils 2.36 will add SHF_GNU_RETAIN support. SHF_GNU_BUILD_NOTE > was also missing from the glibc header. What is SHF_GNU_BUILD_NOTE? What sets it, when is it set and how should the presence or absence of the flag be interpreted? Thanks, Mark