From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76DD6385802A for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 14:41:12 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 76DD6385802A Received: from mail-io1-f72.google.com (mail-io1-f72.google.com [209.85.166.72]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-277-uK3kw2XUO-STsURoMWREYg-1; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 09:41:09 -0500 X-MC-Unique: uK3kw2XUO-STsURoMWREYg-1 Received: by mail-io1-f72.google.com with SMTP id w16-20020a5d8a10000000b005e241c13c7bso23825354iod.3 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 06:41:09 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent :content-language:to:from:subject:organization :content-transfer-encoding; bh=4pGhsBrO5H2h2Fdqm4srq10rC7tyD0S5yGDgxJ+wmNk=; b=npjgSXumSSBEzA8aa6bxo+4GwkO0P05i5r52znB5howZHT+Mlakhe2WSTByDSj15Je nc/V6Yv0lUN54zxlgdLOCaMkZ9zJO/331fuizK94nJOfkYK5nY2kHB1txJUcqNjJiRFv FYlbs7R2Bf+xdWRnpKKQc/96x9XD+eFRDkIKspBo4weDRnog9S+I4LBrfyvBcpT2KBZU Lm9nZFuTkMSOfG31GvP7LPcmHR9cLuLyEfaAYR/gcsOsV/QQOOJC4NqDUR63BBkbQhEj dh+ZLDPWAiEiySVDGwyXAL0qYrTpKlFnjSR+VZYgGX7UIZwFMSif53pq74Ndm4I9Ba2W Ty+w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531WmdCgouI+E6+uqctLjjTCM4qpvD5wQ34tDI8nR/bJHZDYv3Cj TtkhHvt4whVhd1tcmfdfUvuLyVl3m0UYTMnU7aWSxqPGiWsJqJeFU1VSDVij908d9EhOADz+/YY juUvKBDC14t4+tiRse9VGvW2vt3J/11EO/cnSshHEwn0ipTV7EX2Oonrqe8lU6OsBQx401Q== X-Received: by 2002:a92:cb4b:: with SMTP id f11mr48268930ilq.286.1638283268728; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 06:41:08 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzGqbh6TMbaWjBKQ5Y77WsDVI7CzyIJDjW92cv27zdlx3OZYkU0l27eToZIO35RgOyXo6xJCQ== X-Received: by 2002:a92:cb4b:: with SMTP id f11mr48268889ilq.286.1638283268436; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 06:41:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.241] (135-23-175-80.cpe.pppoe.ca. [135.23.175.80]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s9sm10754918iow.48.2021.11.30.06.41.07 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 30 Nov 2021 06:41:07 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <901a46db-67a0-56da-4c66-1c840402bd13@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 09:41:07 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.1.0 To: libc-alpha From: Carlos O'Donell Subject: Monday Patch Queue Review update (2021-11-22) Organization: Red Hat X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 14:41:14 -0000 Most recent meeting status is always here: https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/PatchworkReviewMeetings#Update Meeting: 2021-11-22 @ 0900h EST (UTC-5) Video/Audio: https://bluejeans.com/9093064454 IRC: #glibc on OFTC. Review new patches and restart review at the top. * 306 patches in NEW/NOBODY * linux: Add generic ioctl implementation * Needed for ork1 port. * linux: Add generic syscall implementation * Needed for ork1 port. * Add GLIBC_PRIVATE_RELR as proxy for DT_RELR * What about toolchains that don't use symbol versions? * Why does *_RELR exist in the name? * Is Google going to rebase 2.27 to a more current version? * Ask Chrome OS developers? * Ask Google server branch developers? * What will be the generic ABI mechanism for feature lockout? * Does this impact the decisions we make? * The BSDs don't view it as an issue overall * Except that if we decide on this markup they may need to change things. * Context: Just glibc. Parallel feature lockout via symbol@version. * Add linker support for empty node. * Use dummy symbol in glibc. * Add concrete semantics to that version. -- Cheers, Carlos.