From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 91030 invoked by alias); 10 Nov 2016 09:25:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 90627 invoked by uid 89); 10 Nov 2016 09:25:20 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=HX-HELO:sk:homiema, his, State X-HELO: homiemail-a83.g.dreamhost.com Subject: Re: [libc/string] State of PAGE_COPY_FWD / PAGE_COPY_THRESHOLD To: Andrew Pinski , Florian Weimer References: <193512EC-DC6C-4BDF-8138-1C1F54B30A12@linaro.org> Cc: Maxim Kuvyrkov , Adhemerval Zanella , GNU C Library From: Siddhesh Poyarekar Message-ID: <933fb521-583a-2074-28c4-365fd392479f@gotplt.org> Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 09:25:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2016-11/txt/msg00385.txt.bz2 On Thursday 10 November 2016 02:24 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote: > I found the email thread, it is setup for this Friday. Would you or someone be able to post a summary of the discussion? Last I know from discussions at Cauldron, I am responsible for working on fixing IFUNC related issues that prevent us from doing anything useful in an ifunc, including accessing vdso. It is on my list of things to do right after tunables. Also, FWIW we can use tunables to work around this until the ifunc mechanism is in place. H. J. Lu is looking to do something similar, except as an override for x86 so we don't need any additional work on top of his work. The only requirement is for tunables to be initialized early enough, which it does. Siddhesh