From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 127137 invoked by alias); 24 Oct 2016 17:53:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 127124 invoked by uid 89); 24 Oct 2016 17:52:59 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=iff, HX-HELO:sk:mail-vk X-HELO: mail-vk0-f52.google.com X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=igr5vfSqCnrwO0nDqdruhMVHgQyFHWJb49Rm3dADP9w=; b=iWYGqbkYSkQM+WVyWyN9IH5Gspm6Gm7JWFOkwa2VtGXOYCfg51R6L8bxmR7gBI2UbX C9TkG2r5cLRzJZhRAnq8fGx+46V58vmvIM3N6IPlKNAcLyNLAL2Wo8RInvwaR+GMwmeE 2IanXj3AiOpmDM/Ne4tuh9xhHWPcfxeV2TzxZOonyUdVvP9CdofyKiQBfA+2sY9fwXPa 0e30Cf/mAk5ofPgrg3LKHFiPCVWwcuLclzDJtd+MZJWAKH721kMn7uBkE3l2JDlJM0Vj HCrCIDXaMZoqD3eBJw57dUkghGLSV4wJFgfOKTdoef/l3kgVefWduWdj2ojI/ifRMEcS XgCA== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvcFMcFP/rv1kcJGh4OWlllQsjXS5f5MOqCvN+4NgT4wukQ7OYPBybFxdgWc/Thm3y2C X-Received: by 10.31.219.67 with SMTP id s64mr9920032vkg.128.1477331567932; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 10:52:47 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Consolidate Linux setrlimit and getrlimit implementation To: Joseph Myers References: <1477068711-6825-1-git-send-email-adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org> Cc: libc-alpha@sourceware.org From: Adhemerval Zanella Message-ID: <95310794-4b57-3a0c-9998-d156d6962fc5@linaro.org> Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 17:53:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2016-10/txt/msg00402.txt.bz2 On 21/10/2016 15:04, Joseph Myers wrote: > On Fri, 21 Oct 2016, Adhemerval Zanella wrote: > >> +/* The __NR_getrlimit compatibility implementation is required iff >> + __NR_getrlimit is also defined (meaning an old broken RLIM_INFINITY >> + definition). */ > > Do you mean "__NR_ugetrlimit is also defined"? Yes, I fixed it on my local branch.