public inbox for libc-alpha@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>
To: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>
Cc: libc-alpha@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] stdio: Move include of bits/stdio-ldbl.h before bits/stdio.h
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2022 16:25:33 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <95fece0c-8a1c-ce5c-f378-3cda419308ea@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <00f81cc7-ae24-f055-9bd5-42169c6c3a61@linaro.org>

On 24/02/2022 14:10, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
> 
> 
> On 23/02/2022 17:51, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>> Hi Adhemerval!
>>
>> On 3/23/21 18:59, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
>>> I am not sure if this is the correct approach, I am seeing it building for powerpc64le with gcc version 10.2.1 20210126:
>>>
>>> | powerpc64le-glibc-linux-gnu-gcc nscd.c -c [...]
>>> | In file included from ../include/sys/cdefs.h:3,
>>> |                  from ../include/features.h:484,
>>> |                  from ../sysdeps/powerpc/bits/floatn.h:22,
>>> |                  from ../include/stdio.h:7,
>>> |                  from ../argp/argp.h:23,
>>> |                  from ../include/argp.h:2,
>>> |                  from nscd.c:20:
>>> | ../misc/sys/cdefs.h:503:20: error: ‘__dprintf_chk’ undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean ‘__sprintf_chk’?
>>> |   503 |   extern __typeof (__##name) __##name \
>>>       |                    ^~
>>> | ../libio/bits/stdio-ldbl.h:98:1: note: in expansion of macro ‘__LDBL_REDIR2_DECL’
>>> |    98 | __LDBL_REDIR2_DECL (dprintf_chk)
>>> |       | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>> | [...]
>>>
>>> The postprocessor output shows:
>>>
>>> | [...]
>>> |  2820 extern __typeof (__dprintf_chk) __dprintf_chk __asm ("" "__" "dprintf_chk" "ieee128");
>>> | [...]
>>> |  3067 extern int __dprintf_chk (int __fd, int __flag, const char *__restrict __fmt,
>>> | 3068      ...) __attribute__ ((__format__ (__printf__, 3, 4)));
>>>
>>> Meaning we are not using __typeof *before* the function prototype
>>> is define.
>>>
>>> I think to proper handle this LLVM limitation we will need to fully
>>> rework how __LDBL_REDIR2_DECL does the redirect by something similar
>>> to what __REDIRECT does by defining something like:
>>>
>>> | #if __LDOUBLE_REDIRECTS_TO_FLOAT128_ABI == 1
>>> | # ifdef __REDIRECT
>>> |
>>> | /* Alias name defined automatically.  */
>>> | #  define __LDBL_REDIR(name, proto) \
>>> |  extern name proto __asm__ (__ASMNAME ("__" #name "ieee128"));
>>> |
>>> | /* Alias name defined automatically, with leading underscores.  */
>>> | #  define __LDBL_REDIR2_DECL(name) \
>>> |    extern __##name proto __asm__ (__ASMNAME ("__" #name "ieee128"));
>>>
>>> |
>>> | /* Alias name defined manually.  */
>>> | #  define __LDBL_REDIR1(name, proto, alias) \
>>> |  extern name proto __asm__ (__ASMNAME (alias));
>>>
>>> And replace __LDBL_REDIR_DECL with __LDBL_REDIR and __LDBL_REDIR1_DECL
>>> with __LDBL_REDIR1 (while adding the require argument prototype).  It
>>> will allow to move the stdio-ldbl.h definitions to stdio and remove the
>>> header.
>>
>> I don't fully understand how to implement this but I would like to fix this because
>> this the main remaining issue with glibc that keeps LLVM from successfully building
>> on sparc64.
>>
>> Could you maybe help me come up with a patch to fix this issue?
> 
> The idea is to refactor the way we define both the external alias and the
> internal ones to remove the libc_hidden_ldbl_proto, __LDBL_REDIR_DECL, and
> associate macros.
> 
> We will have only one definition, we glibc will define all the expected aliase
> (for float128 or nldbl if the case), instead of redefine the function prototype
> after the initial prototype (as bits/stdio-ldbl.h).  Afaik this is essentially
> what clang does not support and most likely won't.

Could you check if this WIP patches help in our case [1]? It essentially removes
all the *-ldbl.h headers and move the alias redirection on the function prototype
itself.

I am still polishing and checking if this breaks something, so if you find any
issue let me know.

https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/azanella/redir-refactor

  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-03 19:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-22 11:15 John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2021-03-23 17:59 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2021-08-16 12:24   ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2022-01-22 10:39   ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2022-02-23 20:51   ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2022-02-24 17:10     ` Adhemerval Zanella
2022-03-03 19:25       ` Adhemerval Zanella [this message]
2022-03-08 10:34         ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=95fece0c-8a1c-ce5c-f378-3cda419308ea@linaro.org \
    --to=adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org \
    --cc=glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).