From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <libc-alpha-return-95636-listarch-libc-alpha=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 16990 invoked by alias); 3 Sep 2018 10:48:48 -0000
Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <libc-alpha.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:libc-alpha-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 16725 invoked by uid 89); 3 Sep 2018 10:48:31 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=libdir
X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Adjust name-prefix of ld.so in test-container.c.
To: Stefan Liebler <stli@linux.ibm.com>,
 GNU C Library <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
References: <0a6087d9-08a2-d157-163f-25697e9e35e2@linux.ibm.com>
From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <97858524-2c0c-889a-bd23-c8456d334fa8@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2018 10:48:00 -0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <0a6087d9-08a2-d157-163f-25697e9e35e2@linux.ibm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2018-09/txt/msg00005.txt.bz2

On 09/03/2018 10:39 AM, Stefan Liebler wrote:
> the test-container.c file assumes that ld.so is always named something 
> like /elf/ld-linux-*. But e.g. on s390x it is named ld64.so.1 or ld.so.1 
> on s390. There are other architectures like power or mips with similar 
> names.

Perhaps we should capture $(ld.so-version) in support/, like we do for 
$(objpfx), $(prefix), $(libdir) etc.?

Thanks,
Florian