From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <libc-alpha-return-70445-listarch-libc-alpha=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 49786 invoked by alias); 10 Jun 2016 16:09:25 -0000
Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <libc-alpha.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:libc-alpha-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 49776 invoked by uid 89); 10 Jun 2016 16:09:25 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Immediately
X-HELO: mail-qt0-f180.google.com
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
        h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:organization
         :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=LpnCBReEBqPd8FooBU1BgmQrbYraVouSONjwsziJyvY=;
        b=NFf/aAd4g/Yd9zBrGECvHmy4/pQ7m0DeUJyOmASl/gucGo1kag3FZwnIj4Q0YDg1tP
         6IkLFwl/DCYFbC7e7CMAJhZLF7Sd1OZ6nZ5WArwKmw04e9F8dGc3ZPEzxVs/L74342zE
         OwUjq2qjdzT1q8736gcIOB6mbTUESOv+krLmMLXIYkhbcjVhLea1QbdHpV8STPf8TCFi
         x9zJVybRDyPVclB1Ugg0z4oMZwJtVWDHgsNYm71B8RyqrQsRECqkw9TnnsJ0AON/FflC
         RSuMmF8t78JFC3yBnMyXGJaDiYCzN0dgTP5O3PRNTJJjjv75CRzOVXGM9eEbaC+AEGl1
         uKnQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tLQz5+y7r/DjzL9IlGxyFCW/kn0mW5w+a3c33DKWHw3TayufCzegLgSuP8uy7IG/msp
X-Received: by 10.200.42.152 with SMTP id b24mr2557403qta.35.1465574961962;
        Fri, 10 Jun 2016 09:09:21 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: nss_files testing
To: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>, libc-alpha@sourceware.org
References: <57111263.7030205@redhat.com> <57270972.1050307@redhat.com>
From: Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <985f8d83-58c2-6362-9fbd-ac55e139127b@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 16:09:00 -0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/45.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <57270972.1050307@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2016-06/txt/msg00366.txt.bz2

On 05/02/2016 04:01 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 04/15/2016 06:10 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> Some things need cleanup.  I want to submit this for real once I
>> have some experience with adding nss_db support (which will reuse
>> the chroot setup code from tst-nss-files-aux, moving it to
>> tst-nss-files).  Longer term, this approach should also work for
>> testing nscd.
> 
> I wonder if these tests have value as-is.  The existing framework was
> certainly helpful for writing a new test to check my getnameinfo
> changes.
> 
> Should I check them in (and XFAIL the enumeration test)?

Yes you should. Immediately IMO.

-- 
Cheers,
Carlos.