From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=D64t=4G=mentor.com=joseph_myers@sourceware.org>
Received: from esa3.mentor.iphmx.com (esa3.mentor.iphmx.com [68.232.137.180])
	by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8259A395BC4B
	for <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>; Thu,  8 Dec 2022 20:07:09 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 8259A395BC4B
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codesourcery.com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=mentor.com
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.96,227,1665475200"; 
   d="scan'208";a="88877965"
Received: from orw-gwy-02-in.mentorg.com ([192.94.38.167])
  by esa3.mentor.iphmx.com with ESMTP; 08 Dec 2022 12:07:08 -0800
IronPort-SDR: r94uU6drouNbouBbs7ICVg46haRfidhyLzIkKpdYk5iGZFURxCrjie+B29Fi4E2PSj5ysyPO/8
 n0/Tga03weeBjPuQZ+JCJlNvZDrgkfBgj8DfKx1Aqw+laJ4pSr9LkMIsAN3JHoaD+X+k/v29pj
 ibcM6BJ2WFq4shQskcEOSmWFZJ6nb9yaywCyhFqshZr9rfR0e25t3wdOqlP8u7t3vNUcDr6++j
 6PX+/wNTd+fF8KykPf5/Sh0Fy7dY3vH3dsXt549CTs48SoZpE/bquFg2XjpSqNyxrreE52RMWT
 Ix8=
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2022 20:06:59 +0000
From: Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>
To: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>
CC: <ludovic@rivosinc.com>, <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: Behaviour differences on x86 and RISC-V on cos/sin functions
In-Reply-To: <mhng-a22abeda-aeb4-485e-9b45-c1a514c26252@palmer-ri-x1c9a>
Message-ID: <9add23f-a02c-f5a3-298e-d0b95d52c219@codesourcery.com>
References: <mhng-a22abeda-aeb4-485e-9b45-c1a514c26252@palmer-ri-x1c9a>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Originating-IP: [137.202.0.90]
X-ClientProxiedBy: svr-ies-mbx-12.mgc.mentorg.com (139.181.222.12) To
 svr-ies-mbx-10.mgc.mentorg.com (139.181.222.10)
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3109.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org
List-Id: <libc-alpha.sourceware.org>

On Thu, 8 Dec 2022, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:

> So it's OK to follow the RISC-V rules for library functions?  We don't have

Yes (only a few functions such as fabs and copysign need to do anything in 
particular regarding NaN payloads or signs).

> In other words: it's safe to call this behavior not a bug?

Correct.

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com