From: Adhemerval Zanella Netto <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>
To: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>,
"debian-alpha@lists.debian.org" <debian-alpha@lists.debian.org>
Cc: gentoo-alpha@lists.gentoo.org,
GNU C Library <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>,
Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Update on the glibc segfault issue on Alpha
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2023 09:00:16 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9d2cac45-b81b-fa5f-e0e7-87396645bcfe@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <61cb548d-f5ee-bd6c-6d5f-b80e10f4be9e@physik.fu-berlin.de>
On 04/01/23 06:25, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Hi Adhemerval!
>
> On 1/3/23 13:09, Adhemerval Zanella Netto wrote:
>> Thanks, this commits helps narrow down the issue. The 73fc4e28b9464f0e refactor did not
>> add the GL(dl_phdr) and GL(dl_phnum) for static case, relying on the __ehdr_start symbol
>> to get the correct values.
>>
>> The issue is for some archs, alpha for instance, the hidden weak reference is not making
>> the static linker to define the __ehdr_start address correctly: it is being set to 0 and
>> thus GL(dl_phdr) and GL(dl_phnum) are set to invalid values.
>>
>> And I am not sure if the hidden weak __ehdr_start does work on all architectures, so I
>> think it would be safer to just restore the previous behavior to setup GL(dl_phdr) and
>> GL(dl_phnum) for static and we can simplify __ehdr_start fallback case to not use
>> a weak ref (as for PIE). I am checking if the following patch trigger any regression,
>> at least for alpha it fixes the static failures:
>>
>> diff --git a/csu/libc-start.c b/csu/libc-start.c
>> index 543560f36c..63a3eceaea 100644
>> --- a/csu/libc-start.c
>> +++ b/csu/libc-start.c
>> @@ -271,18 +271,10 @@ LIBC_START_MAIN (int (*main) (int, char **, char ** MAIN_AUXVEC_DECL),
>> So we can set up _dl_phdr and _dl_phnum even without any
>> information from auxv. */
>>
>> - extern const ElfW(Ehdr) __ehdr_start
>> -# if BUILD_PIE_DEFAULT
>> - __attribute__ ((visibility ("hidden")));
>> -# else
>> - __attribute__ ((weak, visibility ("hidden")));
>> - if (&__ehdr_start != NULL)
>> -# endif
>> - {
>> - assert (__ehdr_start.e_phentsize == sizeof *GL(dl_phdr));
>> - GL(dl_phdr) = (const void *) &__ehdr_start + __ehdr_start.e_phoff;
>> - GL(dl_phnum) = __ehdr_start.e_phnum;
>> - }
>> + extern const ElfW(Ehdr) __ehdr_start attribute_hidden;
>> + assert (__ehdr_start.e_phentsize == sizeof *GL(dl_phdr));
>> + GL(dl_phdr) = (const void *) &__ehdr_start + __ehdr_start.e_phoff;
>> + GL(dl_phnum) = __ehdr_start.e_phnum;
>> }
>>
>> __tunables_init (__environ);
>> diff --git a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/dl-parse_auxv.h b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/dl-parse_auxv.h
>> index bf9374371e..5913c9d6e5 100644
>> --- a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/dl-parse_auxv.h
>> +++ b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/dl-parse_auxv.h
>> @@ -56,6 +56,10 @@ void _dl_parse_auxv (ElfW(auxv_t) *av, dl_parse_auxv_t auxv_values)
>> if (GLRO(dl_sysinfo_dso) != NULL)
>> GLRO(dl_sysinfo) = auxv_values[AT_SYSINFO];
>> #endif
>> +#ifndef SHARED
>> + GL(dl_phdr) = (void*) auxv_values[AT_PHDR];
>> + GL(dl_phnum) = auxv_values[AT_PHENT];
>> +#endif
>>
>> DL_PLATFORM_AUXV
>> }
>
> I can confirm that this patch fixes the problem for me. I have uploaded a manually built glibc
> package with the patch applied to Debian »unreleased« so that the buildds can resume building
> packages again.
>
> Would it be possible to backport this patch to 2.36 once it has been merged with the current
> development tree? The reason is that I don't think that Debian is going to switch to anything
> beyond 2.36 anytime soon due to the upcoming feature freeze in January.
I have sent a more detailed patch [1] and I will probably backport to all affected releases
once it is accepted.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-04 12:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-02 11:44 John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2023-01-02 17:37 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2023-01-03 12:09 ` Adhemerval Zanella Netto
2023-01-03 13:29 ` Florian Weimer
2023-01-03 13:47 ` Adhemerval Zanella Netto
2023-01-04 9:25 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2023-01-04 12:00 ` Adhemerval Zanella Netto [this message]
2023-01-05 11:25 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9d2cac45-b81b-fa5f-e0e7-87396645bcfe@linaro.org \
--to=adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org \
--cc=debian-alpha@lists.debian.org \
--cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=gentoo-alpha@lists.gentoo.org \
--cc=glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de \
--cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).