From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 83994 invoked by alias); 3 Oct 2017 19:34:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 82341 invoked by uid 89); 3 Oct 2017 19:34:13 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: mail-qt0-f180.google.com X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=FAJJ+iSZVFVa6wlunn4TldenI/R9Pxjw7SZlbZLrqJU=; b=XzuRbtSO6glYi85uhPhjydv8KU2C4XftFhjj9UHWFbsTDYSYdBj5NcGRj2kvz02X1U KPInlwGt6LnEI+RO6cGBxzgZCW673iiaXVj7g3cnV9IIG9+CiDMV8EnM1clEAyxmIqsG kiztVxb7dNljGu3sSSYjXqtsgYsaKtK7EaJj1DGLO7xxRrhOem/UeRXSy5LqTvxwB+mp qrNKcdo4EACwB9Z3wgSyVQEZ/O6KiLi9JEslk4f9LmhFZ6yy4KlAqrcCIhdWiEJky5aj jpMVVVnM4Sevyw7oCdyJFLfOteikS3iXwdAJvIed7zB4VRiYKuKBH7KMKTPEywYvlXdh 1QTg== X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaVK15umJ5XDQHB+O7Zs8Oud5r5hnymjLDQlAJHhESdO5awmVjYt V5s6ZPKDijVHD+sY4Kcug9j0/RnXj6w= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QBU41wG9iMIYXGK8WKsD43g78zr0UinL7kZhJKdm0i/3IrX7HzfInWkWZ0M1o1eZpLYgXaKcw== X-Received: by 10.200.27.28 with SMTP id y28mr26019114qtj.297.1507059250278; Tue, 03 Oct 2017 12:34:10 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Refactoring FORTIFY To: George Burgess IV , libc-alpha@sourceware.org References: From: Adhemerval Zanella Message-ID: <9ea2b3d3-c7d0-1d36-db4d-4de7b21067f1@linaro.org> Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2017 19:34:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2017-10/txt/msg00129.txt.bz2 On 11/09/2017 03:26, George Burgess IV wrote: > Hello, > > Attached is a patch that aims to substantially improve FORTIFY's > usefulness with clang, and make defining FORTIFY'ed functions require > less ceremony. Due the patch size and complexity and no indication on the message, it would be good to know if you already have a copyright assignment, and if your work is covered by it. You will need it to sort this out first so someone can actually look into your patch (which I am interested in review btw).