From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 112061 invoked by alias); 17 Dec 2015 13:48:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 112051 invoked by uid 89); 17 Dec 2015 13:48:33 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=concluded, Hx-spam-relays-external:sk:mail-db, H*RU:sk:mail-db X-HELO: eu-smtp-delivery-143.mimecast.com From: Wilco Dijkstra To: Joseph Myers CC: 'GNU C Library' , nd Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/2] Remove ancient GCC string inlines Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 13:48:00 -0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1;AM3PR08MB0085;5:6Pi4xpGnEv6q4/wtPDm5eHfJfXqszI4ZOtr6NV7cKKNDg/zX8xipXJ99Il7Toigpj8XvSHOisGrUvEqBa7Hnm4JOiA9q1p5lrLKlmaU/Gi6eCDj6AC+yAYl9szl7C9Ln7/b8LgOukawUR4+ZZwY7Ig==;24:ONbu26Eq42D1sODVA+5sjnr24I1VHNnMQaOqR6gZQbwhMZ+Xtr/gTbx9fnXj6Hyo3Lb89PKOY7M2LEnQR7WvKSGGlZ/HV2SB7xqufD92y0Y=;20:Vz8Oh35etPG9ja6Z0bL9LFQRt6bUFrjSxIiCONx7KjATGj1QHhobaVwKEyIvdUEIqKtC5BTMlmBtuOTA6Dx8Q3t8MP6CDQRD6JEewVeUG9ZzZzrXqu41hYBdY+7Klfu5YFNQ11zrC3EueISGYRbMOucQmOq0vaQXl9Y5rCle2VY= x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:AM3PR08MB0085; nodisclaimer: True x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:; x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(601004)(2401047)(5005006)(520078)(8121501046)(3002001)(10201501046);SRVR:AM3PR08MB0085;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:AM3PR08MB0085; x-forefront-prvs: 07935ACF08 x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM;SFS:(10009020)(6009001)(24454002)(199003)(189002)(97736004)(40100003)(2900100001)(1096002)(92566002)(102836003)(6116002)(3846002)(1220700001)(586003)(33656002)(66066001)(74316001)(76576001)(101416001)(106356001)(105586002)(76176999)(54356999)(50986999)(87936001)(5003600100002)(5002640100001)(5008740100001)(110136002)(81156007)(5250100002)(86362001)(189998001)(2950100001)(5004730100002)(5001960100002);DIR:OUT;SFP:1101;SCL:1;SRVR:AM3PR08MB0085;H:AM3PR08MB0088.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com;FPR:;SPF:None;PTR:InfoNoRecords;A:1;MX:1;LANG:en; spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23 spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: arm.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 17 Dec 2015 13:48:26.9039 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: f34e5979-57d9-4aaa-ad4d-b122a662184d X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: AM3PR08MB0085 X-MC-Unique: AwtVPubXRmKYXkI5eO4TrQ-1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-SW-Source: 2015-12/txt/msg00447.txt.bz2 Joseph Myers wrote: > I think the previous discussion concluded that a new ABI macro for these > out-of-line functions should be added to replace _STRING_ARCH_unaligned > for that purpose, so the patch needs revising rather than simply pinging. We should add another macro indeed, but that can be done in a different pat= ch as my patch doesn't make the existing situation any worse. Wilco