> -----Original Message-----
> From: Libc-alpha <libc-alpha-
> bounces+belagod=gcc.gnu.org@sourceware.org> On Behalf Of Tejas
> Belagod via Libc-alpha
> Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2022 4:26 PM
> To: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
> Cc: Szabolcs Nagy <Szabolcs.Nagy@arm.com>; Tejas Belagod via Libc-alpha
> <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>; Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>
> Subject: RE: Reset HWCAP2_AFP bits in FPCR for default fenv.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Sorry, I intended the original mail body without the 'OK for master?' as the
> commit message. I shall re-post the patch with the correct formatting.
> 

I've attached the new patch with all the comments addressed. I hope I've done the right thing with the mail reply format and the patch attachment.

Thanks,
Tejas.

> Thanks,
> Tejas.
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2022 4:13 PM
> > To: Tejas Belagod <Tejas.Belagod@arm.com>
> > Cc: Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>; Szabolcs Nagy
> > <Szabolcs.Nagy@arm.com>; Tejas Belagod via Libc-alpha <libc-
> > alpha@sourceware.org>
> > Subject: Re: Reset HWCAP2_AFP bits in FPCR for default fenv.
> >
> > * Tejas Belagod:
> >
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>
> > >> Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2022 10:24 PM
> > >> To: Szabolcs Nagy <Szabolcs.Nagy@arm.com>
> > >> Cc: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>; Tejas Belagod
> > >> <Tejas.Belagod@arm.com>; Tejas Belagod via Libc-alpha <libc-
> > >> alpha@sourceware.org>
> > >> Subject: Re: Reset HWCAP2_AFP bits in FPCR for default fenv.
> > >>
> > >> On Wed, 29 Jun 2022, Szabolcs Nagy via Libc-alpha wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > i don't have a strong opinion, but i thought it made sense to
> > >> > restore all these special bits with fesetenv(FE_DFL_ENV).
> > >>
> > >> Yes, I think FE_DFL_ENV (and FE_DFL_MODE) should cover all such
> > >> architecture-specific control settings, even when we also don't
> > >> support the use of most floating-point APIs with non-default values
> > >> of
> > those settings.
> > >>
> > >
> > > Thanks all for your comments.
> > >
> > > Florian, given the explanations from Szabolcs and Joseph, do you
> > > have any objections to this change?
> >
> > No objection to the change itself, but you didn't post the proposed
> > commit message.  Please mention “aarch64” in the subject.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Florian