From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 95172 invoked by alias); 11 Jan 2019 20:06:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 95161 invoked by uid 89); 11 Jan 2019 20:06:41 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=H*Ad:D*io X-HELO: mail-ed1-f47.google.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=brauner.io; s=google; h=date:user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:subject:to:cc:from:message-id; bh=JCTMleffxbErC0hsRVPWYcYt41ocK86peCOHk7TWUBU=; b=WTaAhZkSxN2yQNOFLBHeRQxhFl9tk8JTZShRlNljWB/VigCLc3tNjJ70Bic4KHnyrC rkvOPJI5qkY+bxIvC51bFkvhF0R3iUUGGze1Nul90xDDQ4MAK2DKE3sBlAzRZiFDr5wF WEKaasQ8EkNkVeRZA4V44lPMU9VfRhTfbLndFJxMlqNC8iD7lBq8w4GF1FHKipwpT962 XUcDL2pL5GxIYE7nSjFKECly7EpabDjj2/++ik/i1gPm3I2ynFm0aDXvFXa1/CUo1MMu BdBlbGAnDSMOK0GhMPx9+O6j6efQA+N0ClrBjITdZ17wkejoxCPZesXGlrGYJ3CHojSF 3fnA== Return-Path: Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2019 20:06:00 -0000 User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: <874lafezhe.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> References: <874lafezhe.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: Fwd: What can a signal handler do with SIGSTKSZ? To: libc-alpha@sourceware.org,Florian Weimer ,Zack Weinberg CC: GNU C Library From: Christian Brauner Message-ID: X-SW-Source: 2019-01/txt/msg00259.txt.bz2 On January 11, 2019 9:00:29 PM GMT+01:00, Florian Weimer wrote: >* Zack Weinberg: > >> Now, if 8192 bytes is not enough to call some async-signal-safe >> functions, that's another problem and one I would like to see >> addressed by making the unwind library more space-efficient or >> something along those lines. > >Small nit: This is unrelated to async-signal-safe functions because >size >considerations also apply to synchronously delivered signals, where few >(if any) restrictions exist. > >Thanks, >Florian Does this need kernel-side input? Should we move parts of this to lkml or at least Cc a few people (Oleg, And= y, Eric)? Just checking. :) Thanks! Christian