From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pl1-x62b.google.com (mail-pl1-x62b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::62b]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 143E63858D1E for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2022 03:38:45 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 143E63858D1E Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Received: by mail-pl1-x62b.google.com with SMTP id b21so12157338plc.9 for ; Mon, 28 Nov 2022 19:38:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=xpTV6dnsaXpStv+3UD+RPoLS22EI6jHAqIzXRQKqfwQ=; b=NO2iZHKVKn/cqQcIt06ho54RyPev4LaPPK6RE0sG9l6gxFWy3vRRYbQDLUEw2Yar3Q e2i8IrgpUo6Qh7kjH+wxzET3RNCLMTFzE9tbqlyweJ+RRfKDZHpQFepmzRzdzgCHgJKw jUotpcrx1zx/bgMwU/d1FP4qkbaa5HIT9GID6a0iKi0VptGNsFcZDzRnL2Z88BlK7a5i 68YwNjYus9YPPdiOGJ7VcHUrnwwnzXV2MkpylOtAs7Qz34bcHcfWp3+zw9H4XcAp14tX Ghg+o8CzwONrcVQMB+yfhIULskTj80xl5PybPFfXj++gpWBfuGm7QZcEgucZjtgghhTG N1yg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=xpTV6dnsaXpStv+3UD+RPoLS22EI6jHAqIzXRQKqfwQ=; b=vH36Lx3v/qTmjcR5e1FSZj021s3q1DWPU6KestdiK5jbXuck2EvqWPOyfbUVcKmjPB UYZmCq7gGKtx7+ji3qd7eEdWpor2+0ngzuVgUM9YU1Ucz+65J+jINxJhMVmRRlRRAWtd d5JZeIgDj2caiEFQ+/S97ntil7XFIox9gRiswh5hoquwLp/qlmAShUDNM1limUrZ6FJK ViBOdMpccHPB4TSQtUXKAohQ+b36To+GU6F+gpK2tiJ71hjGjzE0dBokER3LDpzfx+Mo ll3JK0kycNF5Xo0HcnDN7IjqTxUWx/BJCCPaFPCkk2R9KsfhzsiPz+RiiX64AsHlvCkp 69Wg== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5plFKrDAhTOjNIXs7cl032NLdz5nQsvshwcl+KcEJ01kDs2m7Td2 5ezQWf1oyZDm3LgIp2l6YVNU/FYHPpBDKFxz3OI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf5uWq5FqxOHSyvqPaKbAp++C73pL3qk4EHlrFq6EFaKVK9PIPKyf02cRzCwdFuHcVtcUaokmBKzkge6/UdtrE8= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:598a:b0:219:1747:f193 with SMTP id l10-20020a17090a598a00b002191747f193mr16986024pji.180.1669693123921; Mon, 28 Nov 2022 19:38:43 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4872FA2D-6165-48DE-B06C-98AE3E788A14@amadeus.com> In-Reply-To: <4872FA2D-6165-48DE-B06C-98AE3E788A14@amadeus.com> From: Andrew Pinski Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2022 19:38:32 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Many float/double errors in math/ testsuite with gcc master branch To: Romain GEISSLER Cc: "libc-alpha@sourceware.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_SHORT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 5:26 PM Romain GEISSLER via Libc-alpha wrote: > > Hi, > > Trying to build currently a toolchain using glibc (current master branch)= + gcc (current master branch) + binutils (release branch 2.39) on Linux x8= 6_64 yields for me 53 test failure in the math/ folder. You can find the li= st of these tests at the end of this mail. Trying to downgrade to the lates= t commit of the current release branch of gcc 12 (so gcc 12.2.1) make all m= y glibc test failure disappear. Checking randomly couple of the .out files = of the failing tests, it seems these test don=E2=80=99t work at all with gc= c 13, there are many errors, and it doesn=E2=80=99t seem it=E2=80=99s due t= o a small change of precision. Am I the only one to experiences these test = failure ? In case you don=E2=80=99t have such errors in the same conditions= , how shall I report these errors for investigation ? Just the .out file wo= uld be enough ? I don=E2=80=99t know anything about these math/ tests, it= =E2=80=99s the first time I see them failing like this. This might be GCC bug 107879 (https://gcc.gnu.org/PR107879 ) or GCC bug 107608 (https://gcc.gnu.org/PR107608 ) . I am suspecting the first one. Jakub has a fix which he is I suspect will be submitting tomorrow too. Thanks, Andrew Pinski > > Cheers, > Romain > > FAIL: math/test-double-cosh > FAIL: math/test-double-exp10 > FAIL: math/test-double-expm1 > FAIL: math/test-double-iseqsig > FAIL: math/test-double-lgamma > FAIL: math/test-double-log1p > FAIL: math/test-double-tgamma > FAIL: math/test-float-cosh > FAIL: math/test-float-expm1 > FAIL: math/test-float-iseqsig > FAIL: math/test-float-lgamma > FAIL: math/test-float-log1p > FAIL: math/test-float-tgamma > FAIL: math/test-float128-catan > FAIL: math/test-float128-catanh > FAIL: math/test-float128-cosh > FAIL: math/test-float128-exp10 > FAIL: math/test-float128-iseqsig > FAIL: math/test-float128-lgamma > FAIL: math/test-float128-log > FAIL: math/test-float128-log1p > FAIL: math/test-float128-pow > FAIL: math/test-float128-tgamma > FAIL: math/test-float128-y0 > FAIL: math/test-float128-y1 > FAIL: math/test-float32-cosh > FAIL: math/test-float32-expm1 > FAIL: math/test-float32-iseqsig > FAIL: math/test-float32-lgamma > FAIL: math/test-float32-log1p > FAIL: math/test-float32-tgamma > FAIL: math/test-float32x-cosh > FAIL: math/test-float32x-exp10 > FAIL: math/test-float32x-expm1 > FAIL: math/test-float32x-iseqsig > FAIL: math/test-float32x-lgamma > FAIL: math/test-float32x-log1p > FAIL: math/test-float32x-tgamma > FAIL: math/test-float64-cosh > FAIL: math/test-float64-exp10 > FAIL: math/test-float64-expm1 > FAIL: math/test-float64-iseqsig > FAIL: math/test-float64-lgamma > FAIL: math/test-float64-log1p > FAIL: math/test-float64-tgamma > FAIL: math/test-float64x-cosh > FAIL: math/test-float64x-iseqsig > FAIL: math/test-float64x-lgamma > FAIL: math/test-float64x-tgamma > FAIL: math/test-ldouble-cosh > FAIL: math/test-ldouble-iseqsig > FAIL: math/test-ldouble-lgamma > FAIL: math/test-ldouble-tgamma