From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <libc-alpha-return-72436-listarch-libc-alpha=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 39769 invoked by alias); 11 Aug 2016 19:39:39 -0000
Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <libc-alpha.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:libc-alpha-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 39753 invoked by uid 89); 11 Aug 2016 19:39:39 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=deem, fischer
X-HELO: mail-ua0-f175.google.com
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
         :message-id:subject:to:cc;
        bh=h4OzfFvAQ6jfp9Xb0SQn3pDPT/VZuoFGWXyobIngFdY=;
        b=Gb88/3k29V9z4FJmTXGgn7tDmOGx9+XOOsPWhDpIFFA4Ebx8UaJh5L9d8x0PorDyem
         XhYwniLWqLI0RTnC+sUIVrogqDlcl6Q9/W/9dWoYI7MdM7apCdKeZEygla93NBFSF65l
         2V4ck6TF/jLeIvF8BB6EYOR0l+2Bmy0U8WeT6dI4m7qjl9Lu01ugVH1g6zhGkbOD2+Jf
         2cQhvBYdT4gOHOHZHVZXcOezYZ11ivlz+DCMgQ3acAj4xKsbgRwuPmeKmlW8VKEPNVeL
         tx75hHHs5XYbjL5HnKzwJMBfcqstYC/G/e1hOt93kjYm9IVjLIeKh+vPDe7sHgw2DtcL
         xvpA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouskuVgrihU/1EZTA1FcQH19QyeYdDfqJ0nCnsEkOqOoQN50E761F1U6cEKxGWFs6dXsBVxZrTMytdVOKtn4
X-Received: by 10.31.61.10 with SMTP id k10mr1366627vka.19.1470944367228; Thu,
 11 Aug 2016 12:39:27 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CABV8kRyq_shUN=ftix8r63u8sdFZo=ZDcXn==BDpkfsiYu-WgA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABV8kRzPpdhRsWOsU+zNEc7AcAqTqm1xdWxM0rufGAjk=yn4TA@mail.gmail.com>
 <87r3b9qn3n.fsf@linux-m68k.org> <CABV8kRwo-Qo5Dnh73_46d6J6kPbZbvubeopXPj-RMOL8CF8Xyw@mail.gmail.com>
 <87inwlqjn6.fsf@linux-m68k.org> <CABV8kRy7G3nGF7YBePHb9QzKQWM-oo9Bw1hQFjR8EfNwbtv33w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CABV8kRwpe3k49Kk5bA-cfsF9vPj6y_1sSe_dWk8F3sTtkeDPGA@mail.gmail.com> <CABV8kRyq_shUN=ftix8r63u8sdFZo=ZDcXn==BDpkfsiYu-WgA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Keno Fischer <keno@juliacomputing.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2016 19:39:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CABV8kRzyUhXoMHXOm1hqgZHtsJLMopcY0Tj5xc6adw_HYu7+3A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add CFI to x86_64 RTLD_START
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: libc-alpha@sourceware.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-SW-Source: 2016-08/txt/msg00354.txt.bz2

Bump again, I would like to make sure this doesn't get lost.
Please let me know how I should proceed.

On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 11:21 PM, Keno Fischer <keno@juliacomputing.com> wrote:
> Hello again. I'd be happy to change this patch in whatever way you
> deem best. Could you suggest what you would like me to do?
>
> Thanks,
> Keno