From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF5E33858C2C for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2021 11:31:29 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org AF5E33858C2C Received: from mail-ua1-f71.google.com (mail-ua1-f71.google.com [209.85.222.71]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-228-O4QOwAD6PWeOZd0415Emxg-1; Tue, 28 Sep 2021 07:31:28 -0400 X-MC-Unique: O4QOwAD6PWeOZd0415Emxg-1 Received: by mail-ua1-f71.google.com with SMTP id g20-20020ab00e14000000b002c96bfebaf6so6948393uak.0 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2021 04:31:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=1UJc8afSrKmGCBTMZSijp+NWUbOLLT7UmnO9Mzn/RV4=; b=j7mkzLL6RPbxifs/5cULX9x1egBD0FRMPUSwF//GZuWUZyUweaIXAjYmCJ5mSfmIN1 Ft1aPjZS6Gzt5BW8BcWhg6YsvLJD52QwWLIbVVLNBDYOdHdgH1p0XOvoNDqr9TxuXf86 Q2I9bG3nF5OGcJcPoNkilXOfn5OzDw0/oTkQXzAClszfWRej1Y6hNIqpj1grJ2b4XJgC jHOmVhpx+Jbgk+g3OhHjgQ3V8HEmVZemBSEDL20DgqPe2hq+yLrCCFXbWQWu4Krih13f Foz0KHMtOAAhObMkBCQVdJn0QaXRtLoozElNNi4Um/tlrHjRu/nVDd+RESXIAW1h+XO5 lFwA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531aIFKjGXaQbIDTNP/7txtjUvSPML+Kgk4K4pgz778fvO77vwTj 5dQp1WIT2uqcyVvYJ68J4qN4am6H3We3GQUNfxKSdxORk1WkGlCli68QhgZMiW8DwlDCvcrfZxp 6WG3+ZycHA/wn0jafg8MFzLQWVekQ80OYZbYO X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:2421:: with SMTP id l1mr4384346vsi.16.1632828687901; Tue, 28 Sep 2021 04:31:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxT8IdVzVhLdoCBekuew3UY08ZIo0W8a6UTBj5ORueRmn075XUOqxsiweNHs7w+4igj3Qt8YpIEIfrFPh9W7gs= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:2421:: with SMTP id l1mr4384333vsi.16.1632828687737; Tue, 28 Sep 2021 04:31:27 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <87h7e59c6y.fsf@igel.home> In-Reply-To: <87h7e59c6y.fsf@igel.home> From: Jonathan Wakely Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2021 12:31:16 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Is __ptr_t needed? To: Andreas Schwab Cc: Jonathan Wakely via Libc-alpha X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2021 11:31:31 -0000 On Tue, 28 Sept 2021 at 12:29, Andreas Schwab wrote: > > On Sep 28 2021, Jonathan Wakely via Libc-alpha wrote: > > > says: > > > > /* This is not a typedef so `const __ptr_t' does the right thing. */ > > #define __ptr_t void * > > > > But nothing in glibc headers ever use that macro. > > See commit f17a42333f. Yes, that's basically the answer I expected. Hyrum's Law strikes again. Oh well, I can use _Ptr_t and it's one character shorter anyway.