On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 4:45 AM Joseph Myers wrote: > > I think it's a misrepresentation to refer to this as a C2y proposal. > You're proposing a new GNU interface and should describe it as such and > justify it as such. Maybe you intend to propose it for C2y or C3x > (whatever the next C standard revision is - we haven't decided on a > schedule and that's not up for discussion again before the October meeting > at the earliest), but I don't see a WG14 document with such a proposal, This is a prepare for such a proposal, I asked Jens Gustedt before about such a proposal, He suggest me try do the implementation in libc first, And that's make sense, and it's make me found the properly function prototype for this. It's doesn't need to be merged as soon as possible, but give us an indication that the correct direction to achieve monotonic mtx/cnd lock/wait support in C2y or C3x, And if that's direction is correct, I would like to use it in project mesa first and waiting the C2y or C3x to be appeared with such a proposal. > and proposals for the next C standard revision can't now be taken until > the C2x ballots (DIS, possibly FDIS) have completed, some time in 2024. > > -- > Joseph S. Myers > joseph@codesourcery.com -- 此致 礼 罗勇刚 Yours sincerely, Yonggang Luo