From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <libc-alpha-return-78503-listarch-libc-alpha=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 34062 invoked by alias); 7 Apr 2017 12:27:58 -0000
Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <libc-alpha.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:libc-alpha-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 34038 invoked by uid 89); 7 Apr 2017 12:27:57 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=
X-HELO: mail-it0-f42.google.com
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
         :message-id:subject:to:cc;
        bh=7r4WjJraohgKLuu8CLNk6RRczmiKyxUUYD9j9+9/wUo=;
        b=dRL72V9lBCpPxIEeAWJm25eb/0Dix0lgOaiJcXl0yGnpHKeAQoB9vEJw35raZzBkqU
         IzgAO3PlR/j7bDNzgWX1xhfboFPzQ3+NmSs78XZfyY92TK3pLf74BXC4/L0Eb1tawKtc
         CRkgRyIGUPrIfG5k6JEFHKuD4U0F3g9xOlKwisjSMQWDP0jlRF78O6MbAz1Yb/S0RE1E
         eHMFx8ITmHHe5vqN7eHpy0YX9kPBeyLmF6VOjA6qkSzpQHyRqxcykSqF31uxbwyqikzy
         jas5DnDRLombw5u+M3r00u9fJwnWKpgWm0uH6g44umEe1KJuFxxAXBZOTFDTvomKeV18
         GZcw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H0Zy6KMxDc+cNoEJ0DjkEy8Mgb5at9Q+5fp/DRM0UlI6AYvneagiL4PI8aAxS27Fw==
X-Received: by 10.36.125.8 with SMTP id b8mr8759513itc.31.1491568075966;
        Fri, 07 Apr 2017 05:27:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.36.2.143 with SMTP id 137mr27749916itu.123.1491568074735;
 Fri, 07 Apr 2017 05:27:54 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAKCAbMjcn0h2S5a5AxpOeRpUaX7mjUBuaTyG6+cvJHpxsSaS7A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20170405054116.9007-1-quae@daurnimator.com> <ce204caa-739f-307b-bc44-f3d17f27e55e@redhat.com>
 <CAEnbY+dyj535NeaOz6EbVU6od3JKV+61PTWx7EXbXeZHCa5G6g@mail.gmail.com>
 <75eb12d0-a3f1-2b37-90d5-0a9a3f7f9a99@redhat.com> <CAKCAbMiLEEfbEhBJ=R3dPyjHikGg5f+A5NAVLOcz=SofDJ=xBA@mail.gmail.com>
 <2be243b1-26b6-9608-61cf-4c6638dd01c7@redhat.com> <CAKCAbMjcn0h2S5a5AxpOeRpUaX7mjUBuaTyG6+cvJHpxsSaS7A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Daurnimator <quae@daurnimator.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2017 12:27:00 -0000
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAEnbY+fxbYvQzsEt0OA-H_j079=ad=ezC-o1-aQVOvjb=GgYVQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAEnbY+fxbYvQzsEt0OA-H_j079=ad=ezC-o1-aQVOvjb=GgYVQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3][BZ 21340] add support for POSIX_SPAWN_SETSID
To: Zack Weinberg <zackw@panix.com>
Cc: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>, GNU C Library <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-SW-Source: 2017-04/txt/msg00129.txt.bz2

On 6 April 2017 at 23:24, Zack Weinberg <zackw@panix.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 9:22 AM, Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com> wrote:
>> On 04/06/2017 03:22 PM, Zack Weinberg wrote:
>>>
>>> It would obviously be better to have a copyright assignment, but this
>>> particular patch may be uncopyrightable on the grounds that there is
>>> no other way to implement the specification.  I think if I had been
>>> given the assignment I would have written token-for-token identical
>>> code.
>>
>> This argument does not apply to the test case.
>
> Oh, good point, I didn't notice that there was a test case in the revised patch.
>
> zw

FWIW I'd find it easier to resubmit the patch without the test case
than to fill out the copyright assignment...