public inbox for libc-alpha@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Noah Goldstein <goldstein.w.n@gmail.com>
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Cc: GNU C Library <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>,
	"Carlos O'Donell" <carlos@systemhalted.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] x86: Move mem{p}{mov|cpy}_{chk_}erms to its own file
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 12:34:06 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFUsyf+Bd5_MJwWC50BADOjyWD5aGxEOH19hRu7yWZxtyB1vEQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMe9rOqf-VQkf9+h=z88UTj==h4R18+0eWXAmOfyPjVpDS2CXg@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 12:32 PM H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 8:28 AM Noah Goldstein <goldstein.w.n@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > The primary memmove_{impl}_unaligned_erms implementations don't
> > interact with this function. Putting them in same file both
> > wastes space and unnecessarily bloats a hot code section.
> > ---
> >  sysdeps/x86_64/multiarch/memmove-erms.S       | 53 +++++++++++++++++++
> >  .../multiarch/memmove-vec-unaligned-erms.S    | 50 -----------------
> >  2 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)
> >  create mode 100644 sysdeps/x86_64/multiarch/memmove-erms.S
> >
> > diff --git a/sysdeps/x86_64/multiarch/memmove-erms.S b/sysdeps/x86_64/multiarch/memmove-erms.S
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000000..d98d21644b
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/sysdeps/x86_64/multiarch/memmove-erms.S
> > @@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
> > +#include <sysdep.h>
> > +
> > +#if defined USE_MULTIARCH && IS_IN (libc)
> > +       .text
> > +ENTRY (__mempcpy_chk_erms)
> > +       cmp     %RDX_LP, %RCX_LP
> > +       jb      HIDDEN_JUMPTARGET (__chk_fail)
> > +END (__mempcpy_chk_erms)
> > +
> > +/* Only used to measure performance of REP MOVSB.  */
> > +ENTRY (__mempcpy_erms)
> > +       mov     %RDI_LP, %RAX_LP
> > +       /* Skip zero length.  */
> > +       test    %RDX_LP, %RDX_LP
> > +       jz      2f
> > +       add     %RDX_LP, %RAX_LP
> > +       jmp     L(start_movsb)
> > +END (__mempcpy_erms)
> > +
> > +ENTRY (__memmove_chk_erms)
> > +       cmp     %RDX_LP, %RCX_LP
> > +       jb      HIDDEN_JUMPTARGET (__chk_fail)
> > +END (__memmove_chk_erms)
> > +
> > +ENTRY (__memmove_erms)
> > +       movq    %rdi, %rax
> > +       /* Skip zero length.  */
> > +       test    %RDX_LP, %RDX_LP
> > +       jz      2f
> > +L(start_movsb):
> > +       mov     %RDX_LP, %RCX_LP
> > +       cmp     %RSI_LP, %RDI_LP
> > +       jb      1f
> > +       /* Source == destination is less common.  */
> > +       je      2f
> > +       lea     (%rsi,%rcx), %RDX_LP
> > +       cmp     %RDX_LP, %RDI_LP
> > +       jb      L(movsb_backward)
> > +1:
> > +       rep movsb
> > +2:
> > +       ret
> > +L(movsb_backward):
> > +       leaq    -1(%rdi,%rcx), %rdi
> > +       leaq    -1(%rsi,%rcx), %rsi
> > +       std
> > +       rep movsb
> > +       cld
> > +       ret
> > +END (__memmove_erms)
> > +strong_alias (__memmove_erms, __memcpy_erms)
> > +strong_alias (__memmove_chk_erms, __memcpy_chk_erms)
> > +#endif
> > diff --git a/sysdeps/x86_64/multiarch/memmove-vec-unaligned-erms.S b/sysdeps/x86_64/multiarch/memmove-vec-unaligned-erms.S
> > index d1518b8bab..04747133b7 100644
> > --- a/sysdeps/x86_64/multiarch/memmove-vec-unaligned-erms.S
> > +++ b/sysdeps/x86_64/multiarch/memmove-vec-unaligned-erms.S
> > @@ -239,56 +239,6 @@ L(start):
> >  #endif
> >  #if defined USE_MULTIARCH && IS_IN (libc)
> >  END (MEMMOVE_SYMBOL (__memmove, unaligned))
> > -# if VEC_SIZE == 16
> > -ENTRY (__mempcpy_chk_erms)
> > -       cmp     %RDX_LP, %RCX_LP
> > -       jb      HIDDEN_JUMPTARGET (__chk_fail)
> > -END (__mempcpy_chk_erms)
> > -
> > -/* Only used to measure performance of REP MOVSB.  */
> > -ENTRY (__mempcpy_erms)
> > -       mov     %RDI_LP, %RAX_LP
> > -       /* Skip zero length.  */
> > -       test    %RDX_LP, %RDX_LP
> > -       jz      2f
> > -       add     %RDX_LP, %RAX_LP
> > -       jmp     L(start_movsb)
> > -END (__mempcpy_erms)
> > -
> > -ENTRY (__memmove_chk_erms)
> > -       cmp     %RDX_LP, %RCX_LP
> > -       jb      HIDDEN_JUMPTARGET (__chk_fail)
> > -END (__memmove_chk_erms)
> > -
> > -ENTRY (__memmove_erms)
> > -       movq    %rdi, %rax
> > -       /* Skip zero length.  */
> > -       test    %RDX_LP, %RDX_LP
> > -       jz      2f
> > -L(start_movsb):
> > -       mov     %RDX_LP, %RCX_LP
> > -       cmp     %RSI_LP, %RDI_LP
> > -       jb      1f
> > -       /* Source == destination is less common.  */
> > -       je      2f
> > -       lea     (%rsi,%rcx), %RDX_LP
> > -       cmp     %RDX_LP, %RDI_LP
> > -       jb      L(movsb_backward)
> > -1:
> > -       rep movsb
> > -2:
> > -       ret
> > -L(movsb_backward):
> > -       leaq    -1(%rdi,%rcx), %rdi
> > -       leaq    -1(%rsi,%rcx), %rsi
> > -       std
> > -       rep movsb
> > -       cld
> > -       ret
> > -END (__memmove_erms)
> > -strong_alias (__memmove_erms, __memcpy_erms)
> > -strong_alias (__memmove_chk_erms, __memcpy_chk_erms)
> > -# endif
> >
> >  # ifdef SHARED
> >  ENTRY (MEMMOVE_CHK_SYMBOL (__mempcpy_chk, unaligned_erms))
> > --
> > 2.34.1
> >
>
> Please make a standalone patch.

The memmove isa raising change has a dependency on it hence the series.

Submit this first then rebsubmit memmove? Same for memset-erms /
memset-isa raising?
>
> --
> H.J.

  reply	other threads:[~2022-06-29 19:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-28 15:27 Noah Goldstein
2022-06-28 15:27 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] x86: Add support for building {w}memmove{_chk} with explicit ISA level Noah Goldstein
2022-06-30  3:13   ` [PATCH v4] " Noah Goldstein
2022-07-05 15:33     ` H.J. Lu
2022-07-05 19:23       ` Noah Goldstein
2022-07-05 19:38         ` H.J. Lu
2022-07-05 19:22   ` [PATCH v5] " Noah Goldstein
2022-07-05 19:41   ` [PATCH v6] " Noah Goldstein
2022-07-05 19:51     ` H.J. Lu
2022-06-29 19:31 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] x86: Move mem{p}{mov|cpy}_{chk_}erms to its own file H.J. Lu
2022-06-29 19:34   ` Noah Goldstein [this message]
2022-06-29 19:45     ` H.J. Lu
2022-06-29 19:48       ` Noah Goldstein
2022-06-29 19:59         ` H.J. Lu
2022-06-29 20:02           ` Noah Goldstein
2022-06-29 20:16             ` H.J. Lu
2022-06-29 22:13               ` Noah Goldstein
2022-06-29 22:13 ` [PATCH v2 " Noah Goldstein
2022-06-29 22:13   ` [PATCH v2 2/2] x86: Add support for building {w}memmove{_chk} with explicit ISA level Noah Goldstein
2022-06-29 23:27     ` H.J. Lu
2022-06-30  3:12       ` Noah Goldstein
2022-06-30  3:14         ` Noah Goldstein
2022-06-29 22:19   ` [PATCH v2 1/2] x86: Move mem{p}{mov|cpy}_{chk_}erms to its own file H.J. Lu
2022-06-29 23:09     ` Noah Goldstein
2022-06-29 23:07 ` [PATCH v3 " Noah Goldstein
2022-06-29 23:07   ` [PATCH v3 2/2] x86: Add support for building {w}memmove{_chk} with explicit ISA level Noah Goldstein
2022-06-29 23:30   ` [PATCH v3 1/2] x86: Move mem{p}{mov|cpy}_{chk_}erms to its own file H.J. Lu
2022-07-14  3:05     ` Sunil Pandey

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAFUsyf+Bd5_MJwWC50BADOjyWD5aGxEOH19hRu7yWZxtyB1vEQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=goldstein.w.n@gmail.com \
    --cc=carlos@systemhalted.org \
    --cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).